Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the E-PL3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the E-PL3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-PL3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL3
E-M1 II | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | September 2011 | Newer by 61 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL3
E-M1 II | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL3 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the E-PL3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and E-PL3 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and E-PL3.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to provide you with greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $399 |