Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Overview

In this article, we are evaluating the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL5, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is fairly comparable but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and CL5 (1/2.5") use different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was brought out 13 months later than the CL5 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the CL5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung CL5

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC CL5 
AnnouncedMarch 2010February 2009Fresher by 13 months
Manual focus  Very exact focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 CL5 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL5

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC CL5 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Absent Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the CL5.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and CL5 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and CL5.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will produce more detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Portrait photography with Samsung CL5
36
 manual focus
 exports RAW formats
 does not have liveview
 low megapixels (10MP)
 sensor  is small (1/1.7")
24
 supports face detect focus
 lack of manual focus
 manual exposure not available
 can't use external flash
 sensor resolution low (9MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
 lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
Samsung CL5 Street photography highlights
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than others (355g)
 fixed screen
 sensor  is small (1/1.7")
47
 fixed screen
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
 lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
Samsung CL5 Sports photography info
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 low fps (2.0 frames per second)
 low megapixels (10MP)
 sensor  is small (1/1.7")
 has no phase detect AF
16
 lack of shutter priority mode
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor resolution low (9MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography info
Samsung CL5 Travel photography info
60
 lighter than others (355g)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 low megapixels (10MP)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
51
 flash built-in
 lack of Timelapse function
 sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not the best (38mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Landscape Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung CL5 as a Landscape photography camera
47
 manual focus
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is small (1/1.7")
22
 lack of manual focus
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not the best (38mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7 inch)
 manual exposure not available
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor resolution low (9MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
 lacks RAW files
 lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung CL5
28
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
 no mic support
25
 supports face detect focus
 wide angle not the best (38mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 lack of image stabilization
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
 lack of microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL5
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung CL5
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung CL5
Also called - PL10
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2010-03-18 2009-02-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 9MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 16:9, 4:3 and  3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 141 grams (0.31 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $349 $391