Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Revealed June 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") feature different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was revealed 2 years after the FZ1000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M1 II scores against the FZ1000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-M1 II | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | June 2014 | Newer by 28 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ1000 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ1000
E-M1 II | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ1000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the FZ1000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FZ1000 is 68 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FZ1000.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II offers the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 831 grams (1.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail price | $1,700 | $800 |