Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a6f8/2a6f88512475e5fddf18d30bed4e5cef64abde04" alt="Pentax K-3 front Pentax K-3 front"
59 Imaging
65 Features
85 Overall
73
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Launched April 2014
- New Model is Pentax K-3 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the K-3 (24MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-3 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 II was released 2 years later than the K-3 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-M1 II scores against the K-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax K-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax K-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-3
E-M1 II | K-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | April 2014 | More recent by 30 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-3 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-3
E-M1 II | K-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | Identical screen resolution |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-3 has specifications of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II versus the K-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82d4e/82d4e4a5f218d8a94ffb2ea7fe4f3b907f9def06" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and K-3 is 68 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa8d5/aa8d58286bdffcc356f08fe68a0bee8503dbb553" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and K-3.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Pentax K-3 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0539f/0539f2b61f4a0480b054a91d148a8196b2a9265e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e79f3/e79f3cdbe26df9f734b2889805ce6b211f4a1c9a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2014-04-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Prime III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6016 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, on, off, red-eye, slow sync, slow sync + red-eye, trailing curtain sync, high speed, wireless, manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 560 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $639 |