Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 175g - 94 x 61 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2009
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax E70, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E70 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and E70 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was launched 7 years later than the E70 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax E70 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the E70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Optio E70. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax E70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax E70
E-M1 II | E70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | January 2009 | Fresher by 94 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 112k | Sharper screen (+925k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax E70 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E70 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax E70
E-M1 II | E70 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax E70 has dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax E70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the E70.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E70 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and E70.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax E70 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio E70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio E70 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 112k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 175 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 94 x 61 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $140 |