Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.

The E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years after the GR which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up against the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Ricoh GR. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GR
E-M1 II | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | April 2013 | Newer by 42 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-M1 II
GR | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR
E-M1 II | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II and the GR.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and GR is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The picture below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and GR.
To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II will have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GR |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 290 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $971 |