Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 Mark II vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Expert Comparison for Your Next Camera Purchase

Choosing a camera can feel overwhelming - especially when faced with two very different beasts like the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the Ricoh GR Digital III. Despite both earning loyal followings, these cameras sit on opposite ends of the photography spectrum: one a feature-packed professional mirrorless system, the other a pocket-sized compact champion beloved for its simplicity and topology.

In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll dig deep into how their build, performance, optics, and usability stack up in real-world photography across genres, helping you decide which fits your creative journey best - whether you’re exploring landscapes, chasing wildlife, or crafting street portraits. Having put thousands of cameras through rigorous testing sessions, we breakdown nuanced strengths, limitations, and value propositions to guide your choice with confidence.

Getting To Know The Players: E-M1 Mark II and GR Digital III at a Glance

Feature Olympus E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR Digital III
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Sensor Size Micro Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) 1/1.7" CCD (7.44 x 5.58 mm)
Resolution 20 MP CMOS 10 MP CCD
Lens System Interchangeable MFT mount lenses Fixed 28mm f/1.9 lens
Max Shutter Speed 1/8000 sec (Mechanical), 1/32000 sec (Electronic) 1/2000 sec
Continuous Shooting 60 fps None
Video Capability 4K UHD video at 24/30p VGA (640 x 480)
Image Stabilization 5-axis sensor shift None
Weather Sealing Yes No
Weight 574 g 208 g
Price Range (Street) ~$1700 ~$400

The specs above sketch two cameras with very different ambitions: Olympus targets professional versatility and speed, while Ricoh prioritizes portability and convenience. Let’s explore their physical design first.

Handling and Ergonomics: Size, Controls, and Design Philosophy

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Olympus E-M1 Mark II: Rugged and Feature-Packed

The E-M1 II is built for sustained use, with a substantial grip and robust SLR-style layout. Its magnesium alloy body is weather-sealed against splashes, dust, and cold, meaning you can confidently shoot in challenging conditions - a crucial feature for landscape, wildlife, and outdoor sports shooters.

Controls are plentiful and thoughtfully arranged with customizable dials and buttons that seasoned photographers appreciate. The top-view reveals dedicated exposure and ISO rings, and a handy joystick for focusing point selection, making it clear this camera favors manual control.

Ricoh GR Digital III: Discrete and Pocketable

The GR III is designed to disappear in your hand and pocket. Its sleek compact form factor weighs less than 1/3rd of the Olympus. While that means it won't feel as rugged or balanced with heavier hands or longer shoot sessions, it's an unbeatable companion for casual street, travel, or everyday carry.

You’ll find a minimalist button layout focused on quick access to key functions but no articulating screen or eye-level viewfinder. The fixed lens and non-tilting screen mean fewer options but also fewer distractions - favored by purists who want to simply aim and shoot.

Display and Viewfinder: Seeing Your Scene Clearly

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus’s 3-inch fully articulating touchscreen livens up composition possibilities, especially for video shooters and macro photographers needing challenging angles. At 1,037K dots, it’s bright and sharp, with responsive touch AF and intuitive menus.

By contrast, Ricoh offers a fixed 3-inch screen with 920K dots but no touch functionality. This lowers the barrier to a streamlined shooting experience, but means focusing and navigating menus rely on physical buttons - a preference for some, a constraint for others.

The Olympus pairs its LCD with a high-res 2.36M dot OLED electronic viewfinder providing 100% frame coverage. This immersive EVF aids precision shooting in bright daylight and fast-action situations.

Ricoh’s original GR III lacks an integrated EVF, though an optional external optical finder is available. This may frustrate photographers who prefer eye-level framing, but it's consistent with a stealth-oriented design.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Sensor Size & Resolution

Sensor size directly impacts image quality potential - bigger sensors generally capture more light and detail. Olympus’s Four Thirds-sized sensor (17.4 x 13 mm, 226.2 mm²) offers approximately five times the surface area of Ricoh’s 1/1.7" CCD (7.44 x 5.58 mm, 41.52 mm²). This fundamental advantage influences noise performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control.

The Olympus’s 20-megapixel CMOS sensor, coupled with the advanced TruePic VIII processor, delivers excellent color fidelity, sharpness, and dynamic range (12.8 EV on DxOMark). Higher native ISO up to 25,600 facilitates low-light shooting with moderate noise.

Meanwhile, Ricoh’s 10-megapixel CCD sensor is smaller and older technology but still capable of pleasing results in optimal light. Native ISO maxes at 1600, with limited dynamic range and noisier shadows beyond ISO 400. For enthusiasts shooting outdoors in good lighting, it remains a compact powerhouse.

Image Quality Characteristics

  • Color Depth and Sensitivity: Olympus records superior color depth (23.7 bits on DxOMark) helping in post-processing flexibility. Ricoh’s CCD gives pleasing color rendition but lacks headroom for heavy editing.
  • Noise and High ISO: Olympus’s sensor excels at high ISO, maintaining usable images up to 3200+ ISO with clean detail. Ricoh’s sensor performs well under ideal lighting but degrades quickly in low light.
  • Lens Quality Impact: Olympus’s interchangeable lens system translates sensor potential into versatile high-grade optics, while fixed 28mm f/1.9 Ricoh lens delivers sharp images with beautiful bokeh but limits focal length options.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Decisive Moment

Feature Olympus E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR Digital III
AF System Hybrid (121-point, phase + contrast detection) Contrast detection only
AF Modes Single, continuous, tracking, eye-detection Single AF only
Continuous Shooting Up to 60 fps (electronic shutter) Not available
Shutter Speed Range 60s – 1/8000s (mech) / 1/32000s (elec) 1s – 1/2000s

Olympus combines a sophisticated 121-point hybrid autofocus system with advanced tracking including eye detection. This system excels for fast-moving subjects - sports, wildlife, and street action - delivering sharp focus in challenging environments.

The Ricoh sticks with contrast-detection AF and a simpler multi-area system offering single-shot AF only. While precise for static or slow subjects, its autofocus can struggle with fast movement or low contrast scenarios.

Shooting speed showcases the Olympus’s professional pedigree. At up to 60 fps burst in silent electronic shutter mode, it’s one of the fastest mirrorless cameras, helping you nail fleeting moments. The Ricoh’s lack of burst capability limits its use for action-packed scenes but is fine for deliberate compositions.

Photography Genres - How They Perform in Your Creative Practice

Let’s break down how each camera excels or falls short in specific photography disciplines.

Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin and Eye Tones

The Olympus’s advanced face and eye detection AF significantly aid capturing sharp portraits with expressive focus. Its Micro Four Thirds system paired with fast prime lenses (like the 45mm f/1.8 or 75mm f/1.8) enables shallow depth of field and creamy bokeh well-separated from backgrounds, flattering skin tones with rich color accuracy.

Ricoh’s fixed 28mm lens makes classic environmental portraits with wide scenes, not tight headshots. The f/1.9 aperture helps background separation somewhat. Skin tonal reproduction is natural but less nuanced. No face detection AF requires precise manual focusing, feasible with practice.

Landscape Photography: Resolution, DR & Weatherproofing

Landscape realists will appreciate the Olympus’s higher resolution, broader dynamic range, and weather sealing. The ability to attach ultra-wide, tilt-shift, and high-resolution primes plus stackable ND filters makes it a serious contender outdoors.

Ricoh’s smaller sensor and fixed lens mean less fine detail and narrower dynamic range, and no weather sealing limits rugged fieldwork. Still, its lightweight waist-level carry and quick startup can inspire spontaneous snapshots in urban or natural settings.

Wildlife Photography: Speed and Telephoto Reach

With the Olympus’s 2x crop sensor and vast lens ecosystem, you get effective focal length ranges beyond 400mm - critical for wildlife distance. Combined with blazing AF and high FPS, you’re equipped to track elusive subjects and freeze fast motion in variable light.

Ricoh’s 28mm focal length and slower autofocus are not suitable for telephoto wildlife, restricting use to close subjects or creative abstracts rather than traditional animal captures.

Sports Photography: Tracking, Frame Rate, and Low Light

For sports, Olympus’s tracking AF, fast 60 fps burst, and decent high ISO are indispensable. Electronic shutter eliminates distortion with fast moving subjects. The robust grip and weather sealing bolster reliability in noisy, hectic environments.

Ricoh’s limits in AF and burst put it at a clear disadvantage. While fine for casual or static sports scenes, it’s unlikely to fulfill spectator or professional needs.

Street Photography: Discretion, Speed, and Portability

Here’s where Ricoh shines. The compact form factor, silent operation, and ready-to-shoot fixed lens make it a stealthy street companion. It’s easy to slip in a pocket and pull out for candid moments without drawing attention.

Olympus is bulkier and more conspicuous but has benefits like faster AF and superior image quality, making it ideal where image precision outweighs portability.

Macro, Night, Travel, and Video: Specialized Capabilities Compared

Macro Photography

Olympus supports focus bracketing and stacking techniques for macro precision within its lens range, aided by 5-axis stabilization. The articulated screen eases low-angle close-ups.

Ricoh offers close focusing to 1cm - a rarity in compact cameras - using the fast f/1.9 lens. However, without stabilization or stacking, detail and sharpness depend heavily on steady hands.

Night/Astro Photography

Olympus has an edge with cleaner high ISO performance and manual shooting modes such as bulb and time lapse. The electronic shutter allows silent exposures - a boon for night environments.

Ricoh’s limited ISO and lack of bulb mode hinder astro and night applications. It nevertheless produces clean 10MP files under well-lit nighttime street scenes.

Video Capabilities

Olympus produces 4K UHD footage at up to 30p with internal microphones plus ports for external audio gear and headphones - tools creatives appreciate. It also benefits from sensor-shift stabilization.

Ricoh shoots VGA video only (640x480), with no audio inputs or stabilization, making it unsuitable for most serious video work.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Endurance

Olympus balances capability and weight (574g) to offer comprehensive travel utility - from capturing landscapes and portraits to videos and action. Battery life is respectable at 350 shots.

Ricoh’s featherweight 208g device is ultra-portable and nearly unnoticeable during travel but compromises on flexibility and battery endurance. Great for casual snapping and urban exploration.

Build Quality, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Considerations

Build and Weather Sealing

Feature Olympus E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR Digital III
Weather Sealing Yes (dust, splash, freeze resistant) None
Body Material Magnesium alloy Plastic/metal body
Weight 574 g 208 g
Size (mm) 134 x 91 x 67 109 x 59 x 26

Weather sealing makes Olympus dependable in rough conditions, while Ricoh’s delicate build calls for care in adverse weather.

Storage Capabilities

Olympus supports dual SD card slots, facilitating instant backups or extended shooting durations for professionals. Ricoh uses a single SD slot plus some internal memory - not ideal for long shoots or large workflows.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Olympus includes built-in wireless (Wi-Fi) for remote control and image transfer, alongside USB 3.0 and HDMI ports. Ricoh provides only USB 2.0, no wireless or HDMI, limiting tethered and online workflows.

Image Samples and Performance Ratings: What The Results Say



Our side-by-side image gallery highlights Olympus’s crisper details, cleaner shadows, and superior dynamic range in varied lighting conditions. Meanwhile, Ricoh delivers characterful JPEGs with pleasing color in bright daylight.

Performance charts confirm Olympus’s dominance in all technical metrics except size and portability where Ricoh scores highest. The genre breakdown underlines each model’s strengths aligning with their intended audience and design philosophy.

Who Should Choose Which Camera?: Expert Recommendations

Use Case Olympus E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR Digital III
Professional Photography Ideal - robust, versatile, and high image quality Not suited for professional assignments
Wildlife and Sports Excellent with telephoto lenses and fast AF Not recommended
Landscape and Travel Excellent with weather sealing and lens flexibility Good for lightweight travel and snapshots
Street Photography Good, though bulkier and more conspicuous Outstanding - stealthy, pocketable, fast startup
Portraits Superior with fast primes and face/eye AF Limited by fixed wide-angle lens, manual focus
Macro and Close-ups Advanced focus stacking, articulating screen Great for casual close-up with 1 cm focusing
Night and Astro Strong performance, higher ISO sensitivity Limited but workable for ambient-lit night scenes
Video Professional-grade 4K UHD with stabilization Minimal, low-res VGA video only
Budget Considerations Higher initial investment ($1700+) Very affordable ($400) for compact enthusiasts

If you want a do-it-all camera with pro capabilities for a diverse photography portfolio, the Olympus E-M1 Mark II is unmatched. On the other hand, if portability, simplicity, and unobtrusiveness are your priorities - especially for street and travel - the Ricoh GR Digital III remains a classic choice.

Final Thoughts: Making the Most of Your Creative Vision

Both cameras embody compelling principles: Olympus pushing technological excellence for high-end photographers, Ricoh preserving accessible, elegant simplicity for casual creatives.

Your choice hinges on your shooting style, subjects, and performance needs. Consider borrowing or renting each to get a feel for their handling and image output. Take test shots in conditions you normally shoot and see which aligns with your vision.

With endless lenses and accessories complementing the Olympus system plus the joy of instantaneous street photography with Ricoh’s compact design, both open paths to creative expression.

Explore, experiment, and capture moments that matter - your ideal camera partner awaits. Happy shooting!

Useful Links

  • Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II official page: Olympus Global
  • Ricoh GR Digital III overview: Ricoh Imaging
  • Hands-on reviews and sample galleries on trusted photography sites

Find your perfect match, then check out recommended lenses and accessories to unlock the full potential of your choice.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh GR Digital III
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-07-27
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MOV, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 208 gr (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Two One
Pricing at release $1,700 $399