Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Sony A9
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A9 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A9 II (24MP) is very similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A9 II (Full frame) provide different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was announced 4 years prior to the A9 II which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A9 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A9 II
E-M1 II | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Olympus E-M1 II
A9 II | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | September 2016 | Newer by 36 months | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 1037k | Clearer display (+403k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A9 II
E-M1 II | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 II has proportions of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A9 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the A9 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A9 II is 68 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and A9 II.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A9 II will offer you extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2019-10-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 3,686k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 678 grams (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 690 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $4,498 |