Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Revealed February 2016
  • Previous Model is Sony A6000
  • Refreshed by Sony A6500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A6300 (24MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 II was brought out 8 months after the A6300 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A6300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A6300

 E-M1 II A6300 
RevealedSeptember 2016February 2016Newer by 8 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k922kSharper screen (+115k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A6300 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300

 E-M1 II A6300 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A6300.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A6300 is 68 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The image below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A6300.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony A6300 will provide more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Portrait photography camera
75
focusing manually
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
80
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Sony A6300 Street photography advice
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
weather sealing
lighter than competition (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
79
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony A6300 Sports photography advice
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high max fps (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
75
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Sony A6300 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather sealing
comes with focus by touch
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
76
weather sealing
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony A6300 Landscape photography factors
76
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
two card slots
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
79
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a good size (3")
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Sony A6300 Vlogging highlights
79
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external mic socket
lighter than competition (574 grams)
35
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone port
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Alpha a6300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Alpha a6300
Type Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2016-09-19 2016-02-03
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Maximum boosted ISO - 51200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 425
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 107 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lbs) 404 gr (0.89 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 85
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 13.7
DXO Low light score 1312 1437
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 400 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Two One
Retail pricing $1,700 $889