Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A6000
- Refreshed by Sony A6500
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A6300 (24MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was brought out 8 months after the A6300 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A6300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A6300
E-M1 II | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | February 2016 | Newer by 8 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 922k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A6300 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300
E-M1 II | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A6300.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A6300 is 68 and 83 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The image below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A6300.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony A6300 will provide more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 404 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 400 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $889 |