Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony H90
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
  • Announced February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90: A Deep Dive into Two Different Camera Worlds

Selecting a camera aligned to your photographic ambitions requires thorough, expert evaluation of specifications, real-world performance, and handling characteristics. This detailed comparison examines the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II - a flagship professional mirrorless camera - and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 - a compact superzoom point-and-shoot. These two cameras occupy vastly different segments, yet both can serve serious photographers who prioritize different attributes. Based on my extensive hands-on testing of thousands of cameras across all genres, this analysis provides critical insights to help enthusiasts and professionals make informed buying decisions.

Understanding the Categories: Professional Mirrorless vs. Small-Sensor Superzoom

The Olympus E-M1 II is a Micro Four Thirds (MFT) mirrorless system camera designed with a pro-grade build and performance ethos. It offers interchangeable lenses, advanced focusing, and extensive manual controls, targeting demanding stills and video users who seek high image quality and versatility.

Conversely, the Sony H90 is a fixed-lens compact superzoom with a small 1/2.3" sensor. It prioritizes convenience, extended zoom reach (24–384mm equiv.), and portability, optimized for casual users or travelers not wishing to carry bulky gear.

This fundamental category difference shapes nearly every aspect of their design and performance.

Physical Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90 size comparison

The Olympus E-M1 II is significantly larger and heavier at 574g, measuring roughly 134 x 91 x 67 mm. Its SLR-style mirrorless body features pronounced grip contours and comprehensive manual controls, engineered for extended handheld sessions and professional operation.

The Sony H90, weighing just 222g and sized at 105 x 60 x 34 mm, is pocketable and ultra-light - ideal for spontaneous shooting without drawing attention. Its slim rectangular body lacks a viewfinder, relying solely on its fixed 3" LCD.

Ergonomically, the Olympus’s dedicated dials, buttons, and textured grip facilitate precise settings changes without menu diving. The Sony’s minimalistic control scheme suits beginners but restricts quick adaptation.

Control Layout and User Interface

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90 top view buttons comparison

On the Olympus, the top plate hosts dual command dials, an exposure compensation dial, and a multi-function control wheel - standard fare in professional bodies that supports tactile, intuitive adjustments during dynamic shooting.

The Sony offers a simplistic top layout with a few primary buttons and mode dial but lacks dedicated shutter speed or aperture controls. Its interface relies heavily on menu navigation and the 3" fixed, non-touch LCD.

While the Olympus encourages creative control and workflow efficiency, the Sony’s layout emphasizes simplicity over speed or customization.

Sensor Technologies and Image Quality Considerations

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90 sensor size comparison

Sensor size is a critical determinant of image quality and depth of field characteristics. The Olympus E-M1 II features a 20MP Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.4 x 13 mm, considerably larger than the Sony’s 16MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor at 6.17 x 4.55 mm. This difference in photosensitive area - approximately an 8x reduction from Olympus to Sony - directly impacts dynamic range, noise performance, and resolution potential.

The TruePic VIII processor, coupled with a 20MP native resolution, allows the Olympus to deliver cleaner images at ISOs up to 25600 (native max), with DxO Mark scores indicating 23.7 bits color depth and 12.8 stops dynamic range. In contrast, the Sony’s older CCD sensor, with a max ISO of 3200 and no raw support, shows markedly less dynamic range and color accuracy.

Consequently, the Olympus E-M1 II produces substantially better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, critical for professional-grade output.

Display Systems and Viewfinder Options

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus sports a 3" fully articulated touchscreen with 1,037K dots - bright, high-resolution, and highly flexible for composing shots from difficult angles. It complements a high-resolution 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder with 0.74x magnification, delivering a precise, lag-free live preview with full 100% frame coverage.

The Sony H90 provides a lower-resolution 3" fixed ClearPhoto TFT LCD with 461K dots. It does not include any form of viewfinder, limiting compositional accuracy in bright outdoor conditions and putting strain on framing hands-free or while in motion.

For critical framing, manual focus assistance, and shooting in various scenarios, Olympus’s advanced display and EVF system far outperform Sony’s simpler solution.

Autofocus Systems and Focusing Performance

The Olympus E-M1 II utilizes a hybrid AF system with 121 focus points, combining phase-detection and contrast-detection, augmented by face detection and multiple AF area modes. Critically, it supports eye-detection autofocus, indispensable for portrait photographers seeking tack-sharp focus on subjects’ eyes.

The Sony H90 uses contrast-detection AF with face detection but lacks continuous AF or advanced tracking. It offers limited manual focus options and no touch-based AF point selection.

In practical terms, Olympus excels for action, wildlife, and portraiture where fast, accurate focus tracking is paramount. The Sony is more suited for static subjects and casual use, where AF speed and precision are less critical.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance

The E-M1 Mark II catapults into league-leading territory with a 60fps continuous shooting mode and shutter speeds extending from 60s to an impressive 1/8000s mechanical shutter and up to 1/32000s electronic shutter. Silent shooting modes benefit discreet photography.

The H90 supports a modest 1fps continuous rate and slows shutter speeds capped at 1/1600s. Its limited peak speed restricts capturing fast action.

For sports and wildlife photographers relying on burst capture to seize fleeting moments, Olympus’s capabilities are markedly superior.

Lens System Compatibility and Flexibility

The Olympus uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, supporting a vast ecosystem of over 100 lenses from Olympus, Panasonic, and third parties. This flexibility allows choosing fast primes, macro lenses, telephoto zooms, and specialty optics catering to virtually every photography discipline.

In contrast, the Sony H90 houses a non-removable 24–384mm (16x zoom), f/3.3–5.9 kit lens optimized for general-purpose shooting but lacking options for upgrades or specialty glass.

Photographers prioritizing optical quality and creative control will find Olympus’s system architecture more future-proof and adaptable.

Build Quality and Environmental Sealing

Olympus designed the E-M1 II as a professional-grade camera with robust magnesium alloy construction and comprehensive weather sealing rating against dust, moisture, and freezing temperatures. This durability enables reliable field use in demanding conditions.

The Sony H90’s plastic body has no weather sealing, making it vulnerable to harsh environments.

For outdoor, landscape, wildlife, and professional applications requiring rugged dependability, Olympus offers an undeniable advantage.

Image Stabilization Technologies

The Olympus incorporates 5-axis sensor-shift image stabilization, compensating for pitch, yaw, roll, and horizontal/vertical shifts. This high-performance IBIS ensures sharper handheld imagery across lenses, critical for telephoto, macro, and low-light shooting.

Sony’s H90 uses optical image stabilization (lens-based) to reduce blur, effective primarily for minor shake.

IBIS technology in the Olympus provides more versatile and effective stabilization.

Video Recording Features and Quality

Olympus supports 4K recording at 2160p (up to 30 fps) in MOV format with linear PCM audio. It includes microphone and headphone ports, allowing real-time audio monitoring and external mic use - features indispensable for serious videographers.

Sony H90 is limited to 720p HD video at 30 fps, with compressed MPEG-4 format and no audio input jacks, restricting professional video workflows.

The Olympus’s video capabilities quantum leap ahead for hybrid shooters integrating high-quality stills and video.

Battery Performance and Storage Options

Olympus packs a BLH-1 battery rated for approximately 350 shots per charge, using dual SD card slots for expanded capacity and backup in RAW/ JPEG workflows.

Sony’s proprietary NP-BG1 battery offers about 290 shots, with a single memory card slot compatible with various formats.

The Olympus system is designed for demanding shoots requiring extended uptime and data redundancy.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Olympus includes built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) for image transfer and remote control, USB 3.0 interface supporting faster tethered workflows, and full integration with modern mobile devices.

Sony H90 lacks wireless features altogether, relying on a slower USB 2.0 connection and no remote operation capabilities.

In professional environments where image delivery speed and remote control matter, Olympus’s connectivity suite is considerably more capable.

Detailed Genre-Specific Performance Analysis

Allocating each camera’s strengths across disciplines reveals:

  • Portrait Photography: Olympus excels with accurate face/eye detection, superior color depth, and bokeh control via MFT lenses. Sony struggles with limited manual control and sensor limitations.

  • Landscape: Higher dynamic range, weather sealing, and interchangeable optics make Olympus preferable for intricate detail and environmental resilience.

  • Wildlife: Olympus’s fast burst rate, advanced AF tracking, and telephoto lens options dominate. Sony’s slow focus and fixed lens hamper performance.

  • Sports: Olympus’s 60fps continuous shooting and lock-on AF provide decisive advantages for fast-moving subjects.

  • Street: Sony’s compactness offers discretion; however, Olympus’s silent shutter and customizable controls maintain competitive edge if size is manageable.

  • Macro: Olympus supports focus stacking and bracketing, critical for high-resolution macro work. Sony’s fixed lens and focus options limit precision.

  • Night/Astro: Superior high-ISO noise performance, manual controls, and long exposures favor Olympus substantially.

  • Video: Olympus delivers 4K and pro-level audio flexibility; Sony limited to basic HD recordings.

  • Travel: Sony’s lightweight form and long zoom range are travel-friendly for casual use. Olympus offers superior versatility for serious travel photographers willing to carry more kit.

  • Professional Work: Olympus’s comprehensive feature set, raw support, and ruggedness enable demanding professional workflows.

Sample Image Comparison

Examining image output from identical scenes highlights the Olympus E-M1 II’s superior sharpness, low noise, and color reproduction. The H90’s images show increased noise, lower detail resolution, and less pleasing color gradations under identical conditions.

Overall Camera Performance Evaluation

The Olympus E-M1 II scores significantly higher on image quality, autofocus, versatility, and build quality, with a trade-off in cost, size, and complexity. The Sony H90 provides a budget-friendly, compact platform that satisfies basic point-and-shoot needs with extended zoom but lacks the features for professional use.

Conclusion: Who Should Choose Which Camera?

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II – Professional Enthusiasts and Hybrid Shooters

If you are a serious photographer or professional requiring a high degree of creative control, outstanding image quality, rapid autofocus performance, and robust build, the Olympus E-M1 II excels. Its advanced sensor technology, comprehensive lens ecosystem, excellent stabilization, and 4K video capabilities place it among the best mirrorless cameras of its generation. It is especially suitable for portrait, sports, wildlife, landscape, macro, and hybrid photo-video workflows. The investment in weight, size, and budget translates directly into superior performance and versatility.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 – Casual Users and Travelers on a Budget

The Sony H90 suits beginners or casual photographers prioritizing compactness and extreme zoom reach in an affordable package. It is best for general-purpose snapshots, travel photography where minimal bulk is essential, and users unconcerned with manual controls or professional image quality. Its limitations in sensor size, video resolution, and autofocus speed restrict niche applications, but for point-and-shoot convenience, it delivers value at its price point.

Final Thoughts on Buying Decisions

Selecting between these two cameras ultimately depends on your priorities:

  • For image quality, system expandability, and professional reliability, the Olympus E-M1 II is a proven powerhouse.

  • For lightweight convenience, affordability, and versatile zoom in a simple form, the Sony H90 fulfills casual shooting needs.

Photographers aiming to build a long-term toolkit should invest in the MFT system represented by the Olympus. Conversely, compact superzooms like the Sony H90 remain appealing as simple travel companions or introductory cameras.

This comprehensive analysis synthesizes extensive hands-on testing and technical evaluation. Both cameras have clear places in the photographic ecosystem, serving different user profiles with practical strengths and weaknesses clearly delineated.

I encourage readers to consider their shooting style, priorities, and workflow requirements carefully alongside their budget to select the camera that best aligns with their photographic ambitions.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H90 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H90
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-H90
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-09-19 2012-02-28
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-384mm (16.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 461k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - ClearPhoto TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 222g (0.49 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots 290 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 1
Launch cost $1,700 $230