Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
28
Overall
31

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Overview

In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W290, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W290 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W290 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was manufactured 7 years after the W290 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II grades against the W290 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W290

 E-M1 II W290 
IntroducedSeptember 2016February 2009More modern by 93 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W290 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W290

 E-M1 II W290 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony W290 has specifications of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W290 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the W290.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and W290 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and W290.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Sony W290
75
focusing manually
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
27
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Sony W290 as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers focus by touch
environment proof
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Sony W290
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect AF
terrible battery power (350 shots)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow fps (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony W290 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
environment proof
offers focus by touch
decent MP (20MP)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
57
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W290 as a Landscape photography camera
76
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proof
2 card slots
terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
41
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Sony W290 Vlogging factors
79
selfie friendly display
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic support
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
28
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W290
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-02-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.90 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 167g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Two 1
Price at launch $1,700 $230