Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SP-810 UZ, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 III was revealed 8 years later than the SP-810 UZ and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 III grades vs the SP-810 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus SP-810 UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M1 III | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 105 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-M1 III
SP-810 UZ | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M1 III | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has proportions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SP-810 UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III against the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3868e/3868efcc4f60408b75be92a138be5b292accd1ab" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and SP-810 UZ is 67 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70fee/70feef2cf8a965e368d29bbfae804f77dcac69d9" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and SP-810 UZ.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will produce greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59408/594080bfdd48fc6a3fca42fad1d04a5d2aa45b77" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/276ff/276ff942153607365727d8ded89e47e64f339ac4" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic IX | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1200s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 0.7 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.20 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Retail price | $1,800 | $280 |