Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 III was revealed 7 years after the XZ-10 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the XZ-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus XZ-10

 E-M1 III XZ-10 
IntroducedFebruary 2020January 2013More modern by 86 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kSharper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 XZ-10 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10

 E-M1 III XZ-10 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III vs the XZ-10.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and XZ-10 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and XZ-10.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography advice
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography advice
77
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
45
manual focus
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Street photography with Olympus XZ-10
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports touch to focus
weather proofing
above average high ISO (25,600)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (221g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography information
Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography information
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
max fps very slow (5.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography highlights
79
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
supports touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
60
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-10
81
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
two card slots
53
manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging factors
Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging factors
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
35
quite wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (221 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIOlympus Stylus XZ-10
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2020-02-11 2013-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 35
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/1.8-2.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lbs) 221 grams (0.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photos 240 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Two 1
Cost at launch $1,800 $428