Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 III was revealed 7 years after the XZ-10 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the XZ-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M1 III | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 86 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M1 III
XZ-10 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10
E-M1 III | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III vs the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d5c0/8d5c056509665ce5f013eda039070348d0f658b5" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and XZ-10 is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40ce3/40ce3471dba13861264c04fc49c02dc6a323996a" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and XZ-10.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97307/97307e2882a6452e21454bbfb7ae35359ff07d45" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53eae/53eaecc0eeefe7f55c92321530cfb24d1b999063" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 240 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,800 | $428 |