Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 III was released 8 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 III scores versus the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus VR-320

 E-M1 III VR-320 
RevealedFebruary 2020July 2011Newer by 105 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 VR-320 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus VR-320

 E-M1 III VR-320 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III features outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 III against the VR-320.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and VR-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and VR-320.

As you can see, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
77
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Street photography advice
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch to focus
environment sealing
above average high ISO (25,600)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high max fps (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
79
environment sealing
has bluetooth
includes touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
70
lighter than average (158 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
81
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
two card slots
42
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has external microphone socket
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than average (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIOlympus VR-320
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Olympus VR-320
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2020-02-11 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580 gr (1.28 lb) 158 gr (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC
Card slots Two One
Cost at launch $1,800 $179