Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a103/1a1032f1dfd06714b7350ef1b9a38b554f7326fa" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front"
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Introduced February 2019
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FZ1000 II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 II (1") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 III was launched 12 months later than the FZ1000 II which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 III scores against the FZ1000 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M1 III | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2019 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus E-M1 III
FZ1000 II | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M1 III | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III features outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has dimensions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FZ1000 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III against the FZ1000 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8466/f8466b83df3b30618947d3233edf528cee3f2ae3" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and FZ1000 II is 67 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33abc/33abcfc82c4aeaf785ef39b4371d2b2dfd8c8af9" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and FZ1000 II.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III features the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The younger E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb6cf/bb6cf696fdcdce92c20e91f60dc1fbd5df4e7d2f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e81/b8e81f5ac4ff4f6d5eb138c2745f0453244c0429" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2019-02-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 808 grams (1.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 350 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $898 |