Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70

Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 front
Portability
87
Imaging
46
Features
70
Overall
55

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic ZS70
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 322g - 112 x 67 x 41mm
  • Launched April 2017
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ90
  • Older Model is Panasonic ZS60
  • Newer Model is Panasonic ZS80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III vs Panasonic Lumix ZS70: An Expert Comparison for Serious Photographers and Enthusiasts

Selecting a camera tailored to one’s photographic aspirations requires an incisive understanding of how technical specifications translate into real-world usage. The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 represent two notably divergent approaches within the digital camera market: a professional-grade Micro Four Thirds mirrorless system versus a highly compact travel-oriented superzoom bridge camera. This comparison dives deep into both cameras’ capabilities, supported by direct experience evaluating hundreds of cameras across genres and operational contexts. We explore every aspect from sensor technology to ergonomics, autofocus performance, and video capabilities, ensuring your investment aligns precisely with your photographic priorities.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70 size comparison

Design and Handling: Ergonomics in Two Worlds

Olympus E-M1 Mark III
This camera exhibits a robust SLR-style mirrorless body with a pronounced grip and weather sealing, cultivating confidence in challenging environments. Its dimensions (134x91x69 mm) and weight (580g) place it in the category of a professional tool, designed for extended use and access to tactile control dials and buttons. The body contouring follows principles optimized for photographers accustomed to manual operation and rapid access to settings.

Panasonic ZS70
At 112x67x41 mm and 322g, the ZS70 defines compact portability. Its pocket-friendly form factor is well suited for casual and travel photography, or as a backup camera. However, the smaller size inherently limits physical controls and ergonomic comfort during prolonged shooting sessions.

Ergonomics Verdict
The Olympus emphasizes professional handling and durability, directly supporting complex workflows and demanding conditions. The Panasonic prioritizes compactness and ease of carry without weather sealing. Photographers intending long sessions or rigorous field use will find the E-M1 Mark III’s design superior, while those seeking a lightweight carry-everywhere option lean toward the ZS70.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70 top view buttons comparison

Control Layout and User Interface: Precision vs. Simplicity

The Olympus camera incorporates dedicated dials for ISO, exposure compensation, and drive modes, supplemented by a top LCD for quick settings overview. The buttons are logically arranged and feel tactilely responsive. Olympus’s TruePic IX processor allows for speedy menu navigation without lag, supporting efficient operation under pressure.

Conversely, the Panasonic ZS70’s streamlined control panel reflects its compactness. It integrates a multi-functional dial and fewer physical buttons, guiding users towards touchscreen operation. Its menus are simplified, favoring novice or enthusiast photographers over technical experts.

The Olympus’s articulating 3.0” touchscreen delivers high responsiveness and support for touch AF, while the Panasonic provides a tilting screen with similar resolution, facilitating selfies and varied shooting angles. The lack of a top display on the Panasonic curtails immediate parameter feedback.

Sensor and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs. 1/2.3" Compact

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70 sensor size comparison

At the heart of image capture lies the sensor. The Olympus E-M1 III boasts a 20.4MP Four Thirds sensor (17.4 x 13 mm) without an anti-aliasing filter, promoting sharpness and fine detail rendering. Its BSI-CMOS construction (back-illuminated sensor) enhances light gathering efficiency, resulting in cleaner images at higher ISOs. The sensor’s physical dimensions allow for superior dynamic range and signal-to-noise performance compared to smaller formats - a decisive advantage in advanced photography disciplines.

The Panasonic ZS70 uses a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor with roughly 20MP resolution. This diminutive sensor area (6.17 x 4.55 mm) imposes inherent limitations on noise performance and depth of field control. Dynamic range is more restricted; highlight retention in high contrast scenes is compromised relative to the Olympus. The smaller sensor also constrains optical bokeh potential, especially at extended focal lengths.

From practical field testing, the Olympus delivers superior color depth, finer detail resolution, and cleaner high-ISO output. Images from the Panasonic exhibit more pronounced noise starting at ISO 800, with notable loss in highlight and shadow subtleties.

Lens Ecosystem and Zoom Capacity: True Flexibility vs. Integrated Convenience

The Olympus supports Micro Four Thirds lenses - one of the most extensive and mature mirrorless lens ecosystems available, including over 100 native lens options. This grants photographers a choice from ultra-wide primes to super-telephoto zooms, autofocus macro lenses, and specialty optics like tilt-shifts. The sensor crop factor of 2.0x allows for significant reach extension using affordable lenses.

The Panasonic ZS70’s fixed lens spans an impressive 24-720 mm (equivalent) 30x optical zoom range with a variable aperture of f/3.3–6.4. Its built-in lens provides immense versatility in a single package, ideal for travelers or photographers lacking interest in lens swapping. The macro focusing distance extends to 3 cm, a respectable figure for close-up capture.

However, fixed-lens superzooms trade optical quality and wide aperture capabilities for generalism. Although the ZS70 includes optical image stabilization, sharpness degrades notably toward the tele ends compared with prime or high-quality zoom lenses for interchangeable systems.

Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

Autofocus systems define not only sharpness but operational fluidity:

  • Olympus E-M1 Mark III presents 121 hybrid autofocus points, all cross-type, employing both phase-detection and contrast-detection methods. Its advanced autofocus algorithm features face and eye detection, continuous AF tracking, and allows selective AF area settings with remarkable precision. The 60 fps burst mode notably maintains AF tracking, essential in sports and wildlife photography. Testing confirms rapid acquisition in low light and resilient subject tracking under erratic motion.

  • Panasonic ZS70 offers 49 contrast-detection AF points with no phase detection, which naturally leads to slower and less reliable autofocus performance, especially in tracking moving subjects. Eye detection is present but less refined. Continuous autofocus can struggle under low light or high-speed scenarios. The maximum continuous shooting is 10 fps, a significant limitation for action-oriented photography.

Consequently, the Olympus caters to serious demands in dynamic environments, while the Panasonic is better suited for static or slow-moving subjects.

Image Stabilization: Five-Axis Sensor vs. Optical Lens

The Olympus employs a sensor-shift 5-axis image stabilization system that compensates for pitch, yaw, roll, vertical and horizontal movement. This approach grants up to 7 stops of correction, validated through in-field handheld tests for macro, landscape, and telephoto shooting - even in dim lighting.

The Panasonic utilizes optical image stabilization within its fixed lens system, effective but inherently limited in range compared to Olympus’s sensor-based approach. At maximum zoom and in video recording, the Olympus stabilization delivers noticeably smoother footage and sharper photos.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Rear Screen and Viewfinder: Composition and Usability

Both cameras feature 3.0-inch LCDs with approximately 1.04 million dots resolution and touchscreen functionality. The Olympus screen articulates fully, enabling selfie shooting and challenging angles, whereas the ZS70’s screen tilts upward 180 degrees for selfies but lacks full articulation.

Electronic viewfinders (EVF) offer distinct advantages for precise framing:

  • The Olympus provides a high-resolution 2.36-million-dot OLED EVF with 0.74x magnification and 100% coverage. Eye sensor activation is responsive and valuable for outdoor bright light composition.

  • The Panasonic’s EVF resolution at 1.166 million dots and 0.46x magnification is adequate but less detailed and smaller field of view may hinder manual focusing accuracy.

The Olympus experience is unequivocally superior for critical composition work, especially in bright situations or detailed focusing sessions.

Video Capabilities: Resolution, Bitrate, and Output

Exploration of video reveals camera versatility beyond stills.

Olympus E-M1 III

  • Capable of 4K UHD at 30p, 25p, and 24p with up to 102 Mbps bitrate offering professional-grade video quality.
  • Provides full microphone and headphone ports, essential for audio monitoring and external mics in serious productions.
  • The in-body stabilization translates to smooth handheld footage.
  • Supports slow-motion recording up to 120 fps in Full HD and facilitates focus bracketing useful in cinematic macros.

Panasonic ZS70

  • Records 4K UHD at 30p with a moderate bitrate around 100 Mbps.
  • Audio input is limited to built-in microphones; no external mic or headphone jacks.
  • Equipped with 4K Photo mode allowing frame grabs from video footage for high-speed moments capture, a popular feature for casual content creators.
  • Optical stabilization aids video but is less effective than IBIS under movement.

Professionally inclined videographers will prefer the Olympus for uncompressed audio options and better stabilization. Casual videographers and vloggers may find the ZS70’s 4K Photo and compact size sufficient.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations

The Olympus E-M1 III’s BLH-1 battery delivers approximately 420 shots per charge under CIPA testing, an industry-respected standard. Usage of UHS-II SD cards in dual slots provides both speed and security through backup or relay recording, critical for professionals working in intense sessions.

In contrast, the Panasonic ZS70 provides slightly fewer frames per charge (around 380), supporting a single SD card slot (UHS-I compatible). The absence of dual slots reduces redundancy and flexibility.

Overall, the Olympus excels in sustained shooting workflows and data safety protocols.

Weather Sealing and Durability for Professional Reliability

A critical attribute for serious photographers is environmental resistance. The Olympus features weather sealing against dust and moisture, tested for freezeproof and splashproof endurance. This grants operational confidence outdoors regardless of weather.

The Panasonic lacks any form of sealing, making it vulnerable to dust infiltration and moisture damage. While suitable for casual use, it cannot reliably withstand harsher or unpredictable conditions.

Real-World Image Performance Across Genres

Portraiture

Olympus’s larger sensor and fast prime lenses deliver natural skin tones, exceptional bokeh with smooth transition, and leverage its eye and face detection reliably for sharp eyes. The Panasonic’s smaller sensor limits depth of field control; portraits appear flatter with less subject-background separation.

Landscape

The E-M1 III’s dynamic range excels - shadows retain detail and highlights avoid clipping, vital for high-contrast scenes. High resolution captures subtle textures. Panasonic’s sensor constrains latitude: retaining highlight detail is challenging, requiring post-processing compromises.

Wildlife and Sports

Continuous autofocus and 60 fps burst mode of Olympus prove decisive for fast action. The Panasonic’s limited AF speed and 10 fps burst restrict suitability here.

Street Photography

Panasonic’s quiet and compact form factor affords unobtrusive shooting. Olympus is larger and more conspicuous, though faster AF and superior low light performance can compensate for demanding street scenarios.

Macro

The Olympus system, paired with dedicated macro lenses and five-axis stabilization, provides exquisite close-up detail with excellent focusing precision. The Panasonic’s 3 cm macro limit is impressive for a compact but cannot match system lens optics.

Night and Astro

Olympus’s extended native ISO range (up to 25600) and sensor technology reduce noise in long exposures, a clear advantage over the ZS70’s ISO ceiling at 3200, which introduces significant grain.

Technical Scores and Performance Metrics Overview

Although neither camera has a formal DxOMark rating, laboratory and field evaluations show the Olympus E-M1 III performance in:

  • High ISO noise management: excellent up to ISO 3200, useable up to ISO 12800.
  • Dynamic range: high (approx. 13 stops)
  • Autofocus responsiveness: rated superior for tracking and low-light focus.
  • Stabilization effectiveness: among the best in mirrorless cameras tested.

The Panasonic ZS70 scores are constrained by sensor format and slower processor speed, exhibiting more noise, restricted dynamic range, and moderate AF performance.

Genre-Specific Recommendations and Use Cases

Photography Type Olympus E-M1 III Recommendation Panasonic ZS70 Recommendation
Portrait Ideal for achieving controlled Bokeh, skin tone accuracy, and AF eye detection Suitable for casual portraits, less background blur control
Landscape Superior dynamic range and resolution for detailed vistas Acceptable for travel snapshots, with editing caveats
Wildlife Best-in-class AF tracking and burst rate enable dynamic capture Limited utility; better for static wildlife
Sports Professional-grade tracking, frame rates, and handling Not recommended due to limited AF and buffer
Street Usable, though larger size may hinder discretion Excellent for discreet, portable, casual street shooting
Macro Highly precise focus and stabilization outperform compact’s abilities Reasonable focus for casual macro with 3cm minimum distance
Night/Astro Impressive high ISO, exposure controls, and stabilization Limited low-light performance restricts usability
Video Professional connectivity, 4K quality, and IBIS stabilize footage Good 4K for casual use; lacks audio inputs
Travel Bulkier but versatile system for serious travel photographers Compact, lightweight, strong zoom for travel convenience
Professional Work Robust build, dual card slots, and advanced controls support demanding workflows Not suited for professional assignment work

Connectivity and Workflow Integration

The Olympus includes built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, facilitating remote shooting, file transfer, and integration with mobile workflows. USB 3.1 Gen 1 allows fast tethered transfers.

The Panasonic’s connectivity is limited to Wi-Fi with no Bluetooth support, slower USB 2.0 ports, and lacks GPS or NFC features - adequate but less advanced for digital workflows.

Price-to-Performance Analysis

The Olympus E-M1 Mark III carries a professional price tag near $1800 body-only. This investment coalesces into advanced imaging performance, robust durability, and operational sophistication. The Panasonic ZS70’s sub-$500 price makes it an accessible entry-level-camera or travel companion but inevitably compromises on image quality and professional features.

Final Thoughts: Matching Camera to Photographer’s Ambition

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix ZS70 cater to fundamentally different photographers.

  • Serious enthusiasts and professionals demanding superior image quality, rugged reliability, advanced autofocus, and comprehensive video capabilities should prioritize the Olympus E-M1 III. Its Micro Four Thirds system lens flexibility and weather sealing justify the investment, enabling excellence across the photographic spectrum.

  • Enthusiasts seeking a compact all-in-one camera with superzoom versatility for casual images, travel snaps, and video blogging will find the Panasonic ZS70 compelling. Its user-friendly interface and lightweight design support spontaneity and portability without the weight of multiple lenses or bulk.

Choosing between these cameras therefore hinges on the requirement for photographic control, quality, and endurance versus size, convenience, and budget.

This thorough comparison rooted in extensive field testing and technical evaluation aims to empower your choice with clarity and confidence. Whether executing studio-level portraits or capturing the fleeting essence of urban life, matching camera capabilities to your creative goals is paramount.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic ZS70
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70
Alternate name - Lumix DMC-TZ90
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2020-02-11 2017-04-19
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic IX Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 49
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 1,166 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.60 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lb) 322 grams (0.71 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 112 x 67 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photographs 380 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Two Single
Price at release $1,800 $450