Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony S2000, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 III was unveiled 10 years after the S2000 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M1 III scores against the S2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony S2000

 E-M1 III S2000 
RevealedFebruary 2020January 2010Newer by 123 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 S2000 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony S2000

 E-M1 III S2000 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony S2000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the S2000.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and S2000 is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and S2000.

As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will render more detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Portrait photography with Sony S2000
77
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW files
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography features
Sony S2000 Street photography features
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus by touch
weather proofing
great ISO range (25,600)
46
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography info
Sony S2000 Sports photography info
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200 seconds)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
Sony S2000 Travel photography factors
79
weather proofing
has bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
good megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Landscape photography camera
81
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
2 card slots
27
screen is a good size (3")
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Sony S2000
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes microphone support
21
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony S2000
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2020-02-11 2010-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 9
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Largest aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1200 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.30 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580 grams (1.28 pounds) 167 grams (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots 2 1
Price at launch $1,800 $225