Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V front
Portability
95
Imaging
38
Features
40
Overall
38

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony TX100V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
  • Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Overview

Below is a extended review of the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX100V, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TX100V (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TX100V (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 III was unveiled 9 years later than the TX100V and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1 III matches up against the TX100V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony TX100V

 E-M1 III TX100V 
LaunchedFebruary 2020January 2011More recent by 111 months
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Olympus E-M1 III

 TX100V E-M1 III 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1229k1037kClearer screen (+192k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX100V

 E-M1 III TX100V 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Sony TX100V has specifications of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX100V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the TX100V.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and TX100V is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and TX100V.

Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III using its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Portrait photography with Sony TX100V
77
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
29
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography info
Sony TX100V Street photography info
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition (147 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography details
Sony TX100V Sports photography details
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
39
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Travel photography with Sony TX100V
79
weather sealing
connects via bluetooth
boasts touch focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
65
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (147g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Sony TX100V
81
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
has double storage slots
42
really wide (25mm)
big screen (3.5")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX100V as a Vlogging camera
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone port
32
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing mic jack
heavier than competition (147 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony TX100V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony TX100V
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2020-02-11 2011-01-06
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic IX BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-4.6
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3.5"
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lbs) 147 grams (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Two 1
Cost at release $1,800 $380