Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 was revealed 3 years prior to the TG-870 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 grades against the TG-870 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus TG-870
E-M1 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer display (+116k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M1
TG-870 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | October 2013 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-870
E-M1 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 versus the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abe87/abe878b493269af14dffef404afaa4204d07fa1b" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and TG-870 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c8ce/9c8cecf369d878b1bda3c457ad4810ac57e911c6" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and TG-870.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 includes the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF easier. The more aged E-M1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f37c/0f37c5f79da5cc0dd148b74462581cfbe2b08ac2" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a003c/a003c16eee226581aadef7061455d6185bd06c76" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-10-28 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePIC VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $799 | $280 |