Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/376a8/376a854d97b2e287bdc42f8b91c8e24498c40056" alt="Pentax K-1 Mark II front Pentax K-1 Mark II front"
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Announced February 2018
- Old Model is Pentax K-1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and K-1 II (Full frame) posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 was released 5 years prior to the K-1 II which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1 matches up vs the K-1 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Pentax K-1 Mark II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Pentax K-1 II
E-M1 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus E-M1
K-1 II | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | October 2013 | More modern by 52 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Pentax K-1 II
E-M1 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 has external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") having a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 II has specifications of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 and the K-1 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69f4c/69f4c5c4d1d9d6e0c829772212461ae4605c4088" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and K-1 II is 71 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34496/344967ecd06923e1fd1d8b1331fc7f9e279f7ccb" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 and K-1 II.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax K-1 II will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 20MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68aea/68aea83d4d03bfc258fedb7e518b6d949e927c0f" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c5a0/8c5a069fe40d3265715b060efa6e022d42c0ad25" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-10-28 | 2018-02-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7360 x 4912 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 819200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF4 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 4.4 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/320s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 1010g (2.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 670 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at launch | $799 | $1,737 |