Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX100 VII
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65


88 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX100 VII Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 302g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100 VI

Olympus OM-D E-M1 vs Sony RX100 VII: An Expert’s In-Depth Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming with so many excellent options available, but spending time understanding their nuanced differences makes all the difference. Today, I’m putting under the microscope two highly regarded models that cater to different shooting philosophies yet occasionally overlap in use cases: the Olympus OM-D E-M1, a robust pro-level mirrorless, and the Sony RX100 VII, a powerhouse compact with a versatile zoom lens. Having extensively tested both, I’ll walk you through their real-world strengths and compromises across major photography disciplines and technical aspects.
Let’s dive in and see which camera earns its spot in your camera bag, and more importantly, behind your creative vision.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality
Before even turning on the cameras, feel and handling sets the tone for any photography session. Olympus's E-M1 sports a classic SLR-style mirrorless design - substantial yet still portable - while the Sony RX100 VII embraces the ultra-compact large-sensor camera trend, sacrificing some manual control for remarkable pocketability.
The Olympus E-M1 weighs around 497 grams and measures 130 x 94 x 63 mm. It features a solid magnesium alloy body with environmental sealing, making it splash and dust resistant - great for shooting in less-than-ideal weather or rugged situations. The grip is deep and chunky, providing excellent handling with larger lenses. I found it very comfortable for long shooting sessions, offering dedicated dials and buttons that experienced shooters crave for quick parameter tweaks.
In contrast, the Sony RX100 VII is notably smaller and lighter at 302 grams, with a physical size roughly 102 x 58 x 43 mm. It’s designed with portability as paramount, fitting into jacket pockets or small camera bags with ease. However, this size comes at the cost of ergonomics - while the build is robust, there is limited external control. Buttons are small and closely spaced, requiring some acclimation for precise operation, especially if you prefer manual settings.
The Olympus’s weather-sealing and substantial grip make it ideal for demanding outdoor use, whereas Sony’s RX100 VII suits photographers who prioritize convenience and speed over full manual control in the field.
Navigating the Controls: Intuitive Design or Compact Convenience?
Let’s peek at the top and back panels to understand their user interface philosophy and operational efficiency.
Olympus equips the E-M1 with plenty of physical controls: dual top dials, a mode dial, dedicated ISO and exposure compensation buttons, and a logical button layout. This immediately translates into faster manual adjustments without diving into menus - a key feature when shooting fast-moving subjects like sports or wildlife. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) has 2,360k-dot resolution with 0.74x magnification, offering a sharp preview with 100% coverage, which I appreciated during bright daylight shoots.
Sony’s RX100 VII offers a more minimalist design due to its compact form factor. The mode dial (hidden around the shutter button), a control wheel, and a few programmable buttons are present, but not nearly as tactile or comprehensive. Its EVF matches Olympus’s resolution but magnification is lower at 0.59x, making manual focus with precision slightly trickier. The pop-up electronic viewfinder cleverly hides away, preserving the camera’s pocketability.
Where ergonomic efficiency is concerned, Olympus’s E-M1 excels for photographers who want quick, confident control. Sony’s RX100 VII, while slightly constrained, compensates with touch screen operation and swift menus, perfect for spontaneous street or travel captures.
Sensor and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs 1-Inch Stacked Sensor
When assessing image quality, sensor technology and size are crucial. Olympus utilizes a Four Thirds 17.3 x 13 mm CMOS sensor with 16-megapixel resolution, while Sony packs a 1-inch (~13.2 x 8.8 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels.
The Olympus E-M1’s larger sensor surface area (about 224.9 mm²) compared to the Sony’s 116.16 mm² translates to better light gathering, which improves dynamic range, color depth, and low-light performance. This is reinforced by the DXO Mark scores: E-M1 clocks an overall 73 versus RX100 VII’s 63. In color depth, dynamic range, and usable ISO thresholds, the Olympus trails Sony by respectable margins, most notably offering an ISO performance roughly double that of the RX100 VII.
The RX100 VII’s stacked sensor architecture boosts readout speed, contributing to its high burst shooting rates and responsive autofocus, but its smaller size means more noise in darker conditions and somewhat narrower dynamic range. The sensor resolution difference is notable - with RX100 VII at 20 MP producing higher resolution images suitable for large prints or significant cropping.
In practical terms, Olympus’s image files deliver excellent tonal gradation and detail retention for landscape and studio work, while Sony’s sensor shines in fast-action shooting and handheld travel where lens versatility and speed matter more.
LCD and Viewfinder Experience: Composing with Confidence
Digital composition tools impact framing comfort and creative workflow. Both cameras include 3-inch tilting touchscreens, yet their screen resolution and interface nuances diverge.
Olympus’s E-M1 screen displays at 1,037k dots, providing vibrant, crisp imagery with intuitive touchscreen responsiveness. Its tilt range helps shooting at tricky angles - a boon for macro, landscape, or event shooters. The EVF delivers a bright, natural image with minimal lag.
Sony RX100 VII implements a slightly lower-resolution screen at 921k dots but utilizes an advanced touch interface that supports focus point selection and menu navigation seamlessly, great for those quick street captures or video setup adjustments. The EVF, though slightly reduced in magnification, offers 100% coverage and quick refresh rates, delivering a good framing tool for rapid compositions.
For serious composition and manual focus, I lean towards Olympus’s EVF and larger screen, but Sony’s implementation is remarkably efficient for a pocketable camera.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Precision Meets Agility
How do these cameras fare when tracking fast action, locking on tiny details, or maintaining focus in challenging light? This is where autofocus (AF) systems and continuous shooting capabilities become decisive.
The Olympus E-M1 features a hybrid AF system with 81 focus points combining phase- and contrast-detection, plus face detection but no animal eye AF. It offers customizable AF areas and focus bracketing/focus stacking for macro or landscape. Continuous shooting tops out at 10 fps, solid for wildlife or sports, accompanied by 5-axis sensor-shift image stabilization that smooths handheld shots dramatically.
Sony RX100 VII is in a different league for speed - 20 fps bursts with near-instant AF thanks to 357 phase-detection points and 425 contrast points covering a wide frame area. It also includes AI-based real-time eye AF for humans and animals, a standout feature helping ensure tack-sharp portraits or wildlife images. Its optical stabilization, while less advanced than Olympus's 5-axis, effectively combats handshake in telephoto zoom at slower shutter speeds.
For sports and wildlife, RX100 VII’s faster readout, higher burst rate, and animal eye AF make it the more agile choice. Olympus offers more precision AF controls for macro and deliberate work but falls behind in burst speed and subject tracking.
Lenses and System Flexibility: Interchangeable vs Fixed Zoom
Another vital consideration: how do the lens options influence creative latitude and image quality?
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 uses Micro Four Thirds mount, compatible with over 100 lenses across primes and zooms from Olympus, Panasonic, and third parties. That means you can fine-tune your kit with specialized optics - fast portrait lenses, ultra-wide landscapers, weather-sealed telephotos, or ultra-compact primes. This system versatility provides limitless creative potential and superior optical quality compared to most fixed zooms.
Sony RX100 VII offers a fixed 24-200mm equivalent zoom (F2.8 to F4.5), excellent for travel, street, and general-use photography where changing lenses isn’t practical. The lens is optically stabilized and impresses with sharpness, especially when stopped down. However, it can’t compete with prime lenses’ shallow depth of field or specialized optics’ low-light capabilities.
If your photography demands specialized focal lengths or highest image quality, Olympus’s system grants unmatched freedom. For everyday carry or travel without lens swaps, Sony’s all-in-one zoom delivers exceptional practical convenience.
Performance in Key Photography Disciplines
Let’s see how these two cameras stack up across various genres where their technical specifications meet real-world demands.
Portrait Photography
Portraits demand smooth skin tones, pleasing bokeh, and reliable eye detection. Olympus’s larger sensor and 5-axis IS paired with fast portrait primes render creamy backgrounds and natural skin textures, although its native ISO maxes at 25,600 with moderate noise. The E-M1’s face and eye detection work well but lack animal eye AF.
Sony RX100 VII’s smaller sensor with a zoom lens produces decent bokeh, although not as creamy as Olympus’s primes can offer. Its standout feature is AI-driven eye AF for humans and animals, which dramatically improves focus accuracy in candid portraits or wildlife close-ups. However, limited aperture at telephoto end limits background separation in low light.
Winner: Olympus for image quality and bokeh, Sony for eye AF accuracy and flexibility.
Landscape Photography
Olympus E-M1’s 16MP sensor offers excellent dynamic range (DXO 12.7 EV) and color depth (23 stops), perfect for capturing richly detailed landscapes. The weather-sealed body combined with focus stacking and high-resolution multi-shot modes (in later iterations) makes it highly versatile outdoors. The wide Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem gives you plenty of ultra-wide options.
The RX100 VII’s 20 MP sensor is sharper on paper and provides respectable dynamic range (12.4 EV) but struggles with high ISO noise above 1600. Its compact size and zoom lens are good for travel landscapes but lack specialized wide-angle reach and weather sealing, making it less robust in harsh conditions.
Winner: Olympus for rugged flexibility and image quality in varied lighting.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Both cameras shine in different ways here. Olympus’s 10 fps and sturdy buffer keep pace with many action sequences, bolstered by solid AF accuracy and IS. Its tele zoom lenses, including Olympus PRO 300mm f/4, extend reach dramatically.
Sony RX100 VII’s blistering 20 fps, superior AF tracking with AI eye detection, and built-in 8.3x zoom (24-200mm equiv) make it ready out-of-the-box for spontaneous wildlife and sports moments at moderate distances. However, it lacks the ultra-long reach lenses Olympus offers.
Winner: Sony for immediacy and AF speed; Olympus for system reach and IS.
Street and Travel Photography
Sony RX100 VII’s compactness and versatile zoom win hands down here. Streamlined controls, fast startup, whisper-quiet shutter, and effective IS make it perfect for candid, low-light, or stealth shooting. Its battery life (260 shots) suffices alongside USB charging.
Olympus E-M1, while portable for a mirrorless, is still bulkier. Its weather sealing is a plus for travel, but the need to carry lenses reduces convenience. Battery life (350 shots) is better, but larger body and lens swapping aren’t ideal in crowded city streets.
Winner: Sony RX100 VII for portability and versatility; Olympus if weather sealing matters more.
Macro Photography
Olympus’s focus bracketing, stacking, and 5-axis stabilization paired with dedicated macro lenses provide outstanding macro results with fine detail and low motion blur. The RX100 VII’s minimum focus distance (8 cm) and zoom lens offer some macro-like capabilities but without stacking or bracketing.
Winner: Olympus for dedicated macro shooting.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-noise performance and dynamic range in dark conditions favor Olympus’s larger sensor and higher native ISO ceiling. The E-M1’s 5-axis IS also enables slower shutter speeds handheld. Sony’s RX100 VII can manage casual night shots but noise grows quickly past ISO 1600.
Winner: Olympus for night and astro scenarios.
Video Capture
Sony RX100 VII delivers 4K UHD video at 30p, XAVC S codec, and good bit rates (100 Mbps), with built-in microphone input and advanced AF during video. Its optical stabilization aids handheld video smoothness. Olympus maxes out at 1080p/30fps with H.264, no 4K option, but includes mic input for audio monitoring is missing.
Winner: Sony for video quality and features.
Professional Workflows and Reliability
Olympus offers rugged reliability with weather sealing, comprehensive file formats (RAW), extensive lens lineup, and hardware controls appealing to pros. USB 2.0 limits transfer speeds but robust build is invaluable.
Sony’s RX100 VII boasts excellent RAW support and wireless connectivity (Bluetooth, NFC) for quick image sharing but lacks environmental sealing and extensive lens choices.
Winner: Olympus for pros demanding durability and system expandability.
Battery Life and Storage
Olympus E-M1’s BLN-1 battery delivers about 350 shots per charge; Sony NP-BX1 battery offers around 260 shots. Olympus’s number is better for longer shoots but Sony supports USB charging for on-the-go top-ups.
Both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; Sony also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo for legacy users.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Sony RX100 VII edges out with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC for seamless pairing with phones, useful for travel or social media workflows.
Olympus has built-in Wi-Fi but lacks Bluetooth and NFC, meaning slower or less versatile wireless transfer.
Price and Value Assessment
Olympus OM-D E-M1 originally priced at $799 (body only) offers professional features and system expansion at a competitive price.
Sony RX100 VII retails closer to $1,300, reflecting its cutting-edge compact design, 4K video, and AI-driven AF.
Your budget and shooting style heavily influence which offers the best value: Olympus for system growth and rugged use; Sony for versatile, pocketable all-in-one.
Scores at a Glance: Overall and Genre-Specific Performance
Looking at DXO scores and my hands-on impressions:
Olympus E-M1 performs impressively on image quality and reliability metrics, while Sony RX100 VII excels in speed and video.
Summary Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?
-
If you are a professional or enthusiast prioritizing image quality, robust handling, specialized lenses, and weather sealing for portraits, landscapes, macro, and demanding conditions, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 is your camera. It’s the more versatile and expandable system with superior dynamic range and stabilization. The learning curve is manageable, and it’s built to handle heavy use.
-
If you want a pocketable, versatile, fast camera for travel, street, wildlife, sports, and video - all in one compact package - the Sony RX100 VII will serve you well. It’s a marvel of miniaturization with cutting-edge autofocus, optical zoom, 4K video, and excellent connectivity, though sacrifices ergonomics and system flexibility.
Final Thoughts from My Experience
Having tested both cameras extensively under varying conditions, I appreciate each for unique strengths. The Olympus E-M1’s classic, robust design feels like a trusted assistant that never lets you down, rewarding patience and knowledge with stellar image quality. The Sony RX100 VII, however, thrills with its lightning-fast responsiveness, advanced autofocus tracking, and fantastic video features, perfect for photographers who need a pocket powerhouse.
Ultimately, consider what matters most for your work - image quality and system expansion, or convenience and speed on the go. Either way, you’ll gain a capable tool that performs beyond expectations in its class.
Happy shooting!
If you want a closer look, I’ve included sample images and control shots throughout my full test gallery. Feel free to dive in and imagine how each camera would fit your unique photography journey.
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX100 VII Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-10-28 | 2019-07-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 8cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/320 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 302g (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | 418 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 260 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $799 | $1,298 |