Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Released January 2012
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 II was announced 3 years later than the SZ-12 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 II scores vs the SZ-12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SZ-12
E-M10 II | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | January 2012 | More recent by 45 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-M10 II
SZ-12 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12
E-M10 II | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-12 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the SZ-12.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and SZ-12 is 82 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and SZ-12.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SZ-12 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 220 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $499 | $350 |