Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus SZ-12 front
Portability
89
Imaging
37
Features
36
Overall
36

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus SZ-12
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Released January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 II was announced 3 years later than the SZ-12 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 II scores vs the SZ-12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SZ-12

 E-M10 II SZ-12 
ReleasedAugust 2015January 2012More recent by 45 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 SZ-12 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12

 E-M10 II SZ-12 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-12 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the SZ-12.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and SZ-12 is 82 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and SZ-12.

As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography info
Olympus SZ-12 Portrait photography info
72
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography info
Olympus SZ-12 Street photography info
83
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (226g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography factors
Olympus SZ-12 Sports photography factors
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
40
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography highlights
Olympus SZ-12 Travel photography highlights
73
features touch to focus
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
does not have a selfie friendly screen
65
lighter than average (226g)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (220 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography factors
Olympus SZ-12 Landscape photography factors
79
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
40
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging highlights
Olympus SZ-12 Vlogging highlights
35
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone socket
31
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than average (226g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SZ-12
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus SZ-12
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus SZ-12
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2015-08-25 2012-01-10
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1700 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 gr (0.86 pounds) 226 gr (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 220 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $499 $350