Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was announced 4 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-M10 II scores versus the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M10 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | January 2011 | More modern by 56 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 614k | Crisper screen (+426k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
XZ-1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-1
E-M10 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II vs the XZ-1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and XZ-1 is 82 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The pic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and XZ-1.
All in all, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will result in extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 320 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $499 | $567 |