Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8885a/8885a4e93f33c4e3d4295612c95591b63ab3d9ae" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front"
68 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 494g - 120 x 80 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FZ40, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the FZ40 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ40 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 II was unveiled 5 years later than the FZ40 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ40 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the FZ40 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ40
E-M10 II | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 63 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ40 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FZ40 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ40
E-M10 II | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ40 has proportions of 120mm x 80mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") along with a weight of 494 grams (1.09 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FZ40 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II vs the FZ40.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0af30/0af30f2f47c57f659ba1ee46bd1691187742f18c" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and FZ40 is 82 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a570/2a57052bba1d6c2a6754bd67ea5171f0bb85f2ab" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and FZ40.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdbed/cdbeda724fe6cbfe74ddd31b732d84c298c1737a" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd603/cd603d2249714397a25ca09553f6652bfbc81cbb" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ45 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 9.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 494g (1.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 120 x 80 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $499 | $420 |