Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
92 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 206g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ30
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS15
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS25
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the ZS20 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZS20 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was brought out 3 years later than the ZS20 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS20 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the ZS20 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZS20
E-M10 II | ZS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | April 2012 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS20 over the Olympus E-M10 II
ZS20 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZS20
E-M10 II | ZS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II provides outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS20 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II against the ZS20.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and ZS20 is 82 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The photograph below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and ZS20.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ30 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2012-04-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $349 |