Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5
Portability
81 Imaging
63 Features
83 Overall
71
81 Imaging
63 Features
83 Overall
71
Portability
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Announced April 2012
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 II
Picsart Introduces AI-Powered Tools to Challenge Canva's Dominance Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus E-M5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and E-M5 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Photographer loses 7-year business to crafty scammers on FacebookThe E-M10 IV was manufactured 8 years later than the E-M5 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 IV scores vs the E-M5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Australia's Largest Photography Festival to Feature AI-Generated Images for the First Time Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Olympus OM-D E-M5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus E-M5
| E-M10 IV | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2020 |  | April 2012 | More recent by 101 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| E-M5 | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus E-M5
| E-M10 IV | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 has measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus E-M5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the E-M5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and E-M5 is 81 and 81 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and E-M5.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M10 IV to produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
Incredible Footage Reveals Eagle Attacking Drone in Mid-Flight Showdown Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
supports RAW formats
Guns 'N' Roses Photographer Alleges Sexual Harassment and Copyright Infringement LawsuitStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Street photography with Olympus E-M5
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
offers touch to focus
environment proofing
above average high ISO (25,600)
Is Apple's Latest 'Shot on iPhone' Video Deceptive?Sports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography info
Olympus E-M5 Sports photography info
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
does not have phase detect auto focus
The highly-anticipated Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS Sports is finally hereTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-M5 Travel photography highlights
supports bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
environment proofing
offers touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Hasselblad and Oppo Join Forces to Create Next-Level 'HyperTone' CameraLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M5
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Scarlett Johansson Stakes Legal Claim Over Her Digital AvatarVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M5 Vlogging advice
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
missing microphone port
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
NASA photographer chronicles decades-long effort constructing James Webb Space Telescope
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2012-04-30 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383g (0.84 lbs) | 425g (0.94 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 826 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | 360 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $699 | $799 |
