Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Introduced August 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus 6000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus Stylus Tough 6000: A Hands-On Comparative Review

When comparing cameras separated by more than a decade and designed for vastly different audiences, the conversation becomes as much about photography philosophy as about technical specifications. I’ve spent hours testing both the Olympus E-M10 IV and the Olympus Stylus Tough 6000, and the contrast between these two cameras couldn’t be more striking - from sensor technology to usage scenarios. This in-depth review unpacks their key strengths and weaknesses, grounded in real-world experience and technical analysis, to help you decide which camera suits your photographic ambitions. Whether you’re an enthusiast looking to step up your creative game or someone who demands a tough, pocketable shooter, this head-to-head will provide clarity.

Setting the Stage: Form Factor and Ergonomics

At first glance, the physical design communicates a lot about these cameras’ target users.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000 size comparison

The Olympus E-M10 IV, a compact entry-level mirrorless camera, sports a classic "SLR-style" body with a grip that comfortably fits the hand. It measures roughly 122x84x49 mm and weighs 383 grams - light enough for all-day carry, yet substantial enough to inspire confidence when shooting. The body features a rugged, metal alloy chassis, albeit not fully weather sealed. This translates to a solid handling experience, especially paired with Olympus’s extensive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem.

In contrast, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 is an ultra-compact tough camera weighing a mere 179 grams and measuring just 95x63x22 mm. Its slim, pebble-like form factor prioritizes portability and durability rather than ergonomic refinement. Designed as a rugged compact for outdoor or casual use, its fixed lens and limited manual controls reflect a point-and-shoot convenience ethos more than a creative photography tool.

If you value a traditional camera grip and manual control, the E-M10 IV wins hands-down here. But for unburdened travel or harsh environments, the Tough 6000’s compact resilience is compelling.

Control Layout and User Interface: Balancing Accessibility and Functionality

User interface design is a crucial factor that often dictates whether a camera becomes a joy to shoot or a frustrating experience.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison

The E-M10 IV features a well-thought-out control scheme with dedicated dial wheels for shutter speed and exposure compensation, plus OLED status display on the top plate. This arrangement speeds up manual adjustments without diving into menus - a critical factor when capturing fleeting moments. The camera also offers customizable buttons and a touchscreen, further enhancing operational versatility.

By contrast, the Stylus Tough 6000 has a very minimalist control layout - no touchscreen, no customizable buttons, and limited exposure controls. Its small physical size restricts button size and number. For casual snapshot users, this simplicity removes intimidation, but for photographers seeking nuanced control and responsiveness, it quickly becomes limiting.

For photographers who prize quick access to settings and tactile feedback, the E-M10 IV has a clear advantage. The Tough 6000 prioritizes durability and simplicity over control.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

This comparison fundamentally hinges on sensor size and quality, as this dictates resolution, dynamic range, noise performance, and lens flexibility.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison

The E-M10 IV is equipped with a 20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.4 x 13 mm, substantially larger than the Tough 6000’s tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor at just 6.17 x 4.55 mm. The E-M10 IV’s sensor area exceeds 226 mm², nearly eight times larger than the 28 mm² of the Tough 6000. This gap translates directly into superior image quality, offering finer detail rendition, higher dynamic range, improved low-light capabilities, and more natural color depth.

Practically speaking, the E-M10 IV’s sensor delivers crisp 5184x3888 pixel images capable of supporting serious print sizes and detailed post-processing. Conversely, the Tough 6000’s 10MP resolution capped at 3648x2736 pixels and smaller sensor translates to increased noise at higher ISOs and reduced tonal gradation.

While Olympus’s CCD sensor was respectable for its time (circa 2009), the CMOS sensor in the E-M10 IV is simply on another level in terms of modern imaging performance. This aspect alone makes the E-M10 IV the superior choice for serious photography work.

Shooting Experience: Autofocus, Stabilization, and Burst Performance

How does each camera perform when the rubber meets the road, from framing to capturing the decisive moment?

The E-M10 IV features a 121-point contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection and touch focus capabilities. Although it does not possess phase-detection points, in practice it performs reliably with quick and accurate focusing, especially under good lighting. The 5-axis sensor-shift image stabilization system compensates effectively for handheld shake, increasing usable shutter speeds in difficult lighting.

It offers an 8.7 fps continuous shooting rate - respectable for an entry-level mirrorless - which makes it capable of shooting casual action sequences like kids playing or pets in motion. Tracking AF modes further support this, though not quite at the high frame-rate level of more specialized sports cameras.

On the Tough 6000, autofocus is contrast-based but much simpler, with fixed-area focus and no face or eye detection. Burst shooting is non-existent, with continuous shooting options limited by hardware constraints and lack of manual exposure modes.

In real-world use, the E-M10 IV feels far more responsive and adaptable, fitting a range of photographic scenarios from portraits to moderate action. The Tough 6000 excels as a grab-and-go option but frustrates when demanding manual control or focus precision.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots

Composing images well is critical - do these cameras enable you to see your subject accurately in the field?

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The E-M10 IV boasts a 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with a crisp 1.04 million-dot resolution. Its flip mechanism allows comfortable waist-level and selfie shots. Complementing this, a high-quality OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36 million dots delivers 100% coverage and 0.62x magnification. This EVF offers real-time exposure preview, histogram overlays, and effective framing that rival optical viewfinders, critical in bright outdoor conditions.

The Tough 6000, on the other hand, provides a 2.7-inch fixed LCD with a lowly 230k dot resolution - far less detailed and with underwhelming clarity in direct sunlight. It lacks any form of viewfinder, electronic or optical, compelling you to compose exclusively on the screen - less ideal for bright environments or precise framing.

For photographers accustomed to a high-quality viewfinder experience and flexible screen options, the E-M10 IV has a decisive edge.

Image Samples: Real-World Output Comparison

Let’s now assess actual image quality across a diverse range of shooting situations.

Portraits: The E-M10 IV’s larger sensor and better color reproduction deliver pleasing skin tones with natural bokeh from fast Micro Four Thirds lenses. Eye autofocus (although not animal eye AF) helps maintain sharp focus on subjects. The Tough 6000’s small sensor, lack of meaningful bokeh control, and limited dynamic range mean flatter, noisier portraits with less subject separation.

Landscapes: Greater resolution and dynamic range let the E-M10 IV capture detailed scenery with rich tonal gradation in skies and shadows. The Tough 6000 struggles with highlight clipping and muted colors, especially under high contrast.

Wildlife and Sports: The E-M10 IV can handle some wildlife and sports with its 8.7fps burst and contrast AF, but fast-moving subjects might challenge it. The Tough 6000’s sluggish AF and minimal burst capabilities preclude serious action shooting.

Street and Travel: The Tough 6000 shines for its compactness and lightweight design - perfect for street photography if you prioritize discretion and ruggedness over image finesse. The E-M10 IV is slightly bulkier but more versatile, with faster operation and interchangeable lenses.

Macro: The Tough 6000 offers a 2cm macro focusing range for close-up convenience but without magnification adjustment. The E-M10 IV’s lens options enable true macro photography with stabilization and focus bracketing - ideal for creative close-ups.

Night and Astro: The E-M10 IV’s higher native ISO and sensor stabilization facilitate astrophotography and low-light shooting far better than the Tough 6000’s limited ISO 1600 ceiling and noisier sensor.

Video Capabilities: Moving Pictures Matter

Many photographers today also consider video features critical. How do these two stack up?

The E-M10 IV records 4K UHD video at 30fps with a high-quality 102 Mbps bitrate - impressive for an entry-level mirrorless. Though it lacks a microphone input or headphone jack, in-camera image stabilization greatly improves handheld video smoothness. The available frame rates and H.264 encoding make this a very capable vlogging or travel video camera for casual enthusiasts.

Meanwhile, the Tough 6000 offers only VGA (640x480) video at 30fps in Motion JPEG format - adequate for simple clips but obsolete by modern standards. No stabilization beyond sensor-shift for images, no audio input, and low resolution severely limit creative video use.

If video is on your checklist, the E-M10 IV is a meaningful step up.

Build Quality and Durability: Ready for the Elements?

Both cameras target different market niches, so durability expectations vary widely.

The Tough 6000 is built for rugged use with environmental sealing to withstand dust and light splashes. While it’s not waterproof or shockproof by modern standards, it offers peace of mind for outdoor adventures in challenging settings.

In comparison, the E-M10 IV is relatively delicate and lacks any official weather sealing. It demands more careful handling and is not recommended for harsh environments without additional protective measures.

Thus, if your photography often involves wet or rugged conditions, the Tough 6000’s construction is advantageous despite dated specs.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Battery endurance and media flexibility often get overlooked until you’re mid-shoot.

The E-M10 IV delivers around 360 shots per charge (CIPA standard), which is adequate but not extraordinary. Using an external battery grip is possible to extend shooting time. It supports SD cards with UHS-II speeds, facilitating fast write and buffer clearance.

The Tough 6000’s battery life specifications are not publicly documented but expectedly shorter, reflecting its compact size and consumer focus. Storage accepts xD Picture Cards, microSD cards, and has internal memory - less convenient and more expensive media options by today’s standards.

For extended professional or enthusiast use, the E-M10 IV offers better endurance and storage versatility.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Modern photographers need to seamlessly share images and control cameras remotely.

The E-M10 IV includes built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth enabling easy tethering to smartphones for image transfer and remote control - features that integrate well into contemporary workflows.

The Tough 6000 lacks any wireless connectivity, restricting it to USB 2.0 transfers. This absence feels fossilized compared to current standards.

Price-to-Performance: Which Camera Gives More Bang For Your Buck?

At launch, the E-M10 IV retailed around $699, while the Tough 6000 had a retail price near $259.

The modern E-M10 IV commands a higher price, but offers technological advantages, superior image quality, manual control, and versatility that justify the investment for serious photographers.

The Tough 6000, although superseded by newer Olympus tough models, may appeal to users on a strict budget or those prioritizing rugged compactness over image quality.

Specialized Performance by Photography Genre

Breaking down the camera suitability for specific photographic disciplines clarifies final recommendations.

Photography Type Olympus E-M10 IV Olympus Stylus Tough 6000
Portrait Excellent (accurate skin tones, bokeh control, face detection) Basic (flat rendering, limited focus options)
Landscape Very good (wide dynamic range, resolution) Moderate (low resolution, limited dynamic range)
Wildlife Moderate (adequate AF speed, lens options) Poor (slow AF, fixed lens)
Sports Moderate (burst rate decent, but limited tracking) Poor (no burst shooting)
Street Good (moderate size, quiet shutter) Excellent (discreet, very compact)
Macro Excellent (lens compatibility, stabilization) Fair (close focus but less creative control)
Night/Astro Very good (high ISO performance, stabilization) Poor (limited ISO, noise)
Video Good (4K UHD, stabilization) Minimal (VGA only)
Travel Good (compact, versatile, battery life) Good (ultra-compact, rugged)
Professional Work Good (quality RAW, workflow integration) Poor (limited control, no RAW)

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

The Olympus E-M10 IV emerges strongly as a versatile and capable entry-level mirrorless camera with modern features that satisfy photography enthusiasts and semi-professionals alike. It offers a mature balance between portability, image quality, manual control, and video versatility.

On the other hand, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 is a niche compact that served well over a decade ago as a rugged snapshot tool but now falls short on virtually all fronts except size and basic durability. It suits travelers or casual shooters who want a tough, pocket-friendly option without sophistication.

Who Should Buy the Olympus E-M10 IV?

  • Photography enthusiasts aiming to learn and grow creatively
  • Portrait and landscape photographers needing detail and tonal quality
  • Hobbyists interested in occasional wildlife, sports, or macro photography
  • Travel photographers wanting lightweight, versatile gear
  • Casual videographers wanting 4K capability

Who Should Consider the Olympus Stylus Tough 6000?

  • Those requiring a simple, rugged point-and-shoot camera for harsh environments
  • Travelers or outdoor lovers needing an ultracompact secondary camera
  • Users on tight budgets or minimalistic shooting requirements

In my personal testing, the E-M10 IV provided a far richer photographic experience and image quality that easily adapts to diverse genres. The Tough 6000 could not keep pace beyond simple snapshots, but its toughness makes it a specialized tool whose appeal remains intact for specific needs.

Whether you choose the sophisticated E-M10 IV or the rugged Tough 6000 depends on your photographic priorities and budget. My advice: invest in the E-M10 IV if you want to progress and control your art. Opt for the Tough 6000 only if you absolutely need a durable, pocket-friendly shooter with minimal fuss.

Happy shooting!

This in-depth comparison draws on hands-on testing, technical analysis, and real-world usage to provide an authoritative guide tailored for photography enthusiasts and professionals alike.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 6000
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus Stylus Tough 6000
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus Stylus Tough 6000
Also called - mju Tough 6000
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2020-08-04 2009-07-01
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 50
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range - 2cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.7 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 4.00 m
Flash options Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 179g (0.39 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $699 $259