Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Announced August 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus VG-160, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 IV was introduced 8 years after the VG-160 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus VG-160

 E-M10 IV VG-160 
RevealedAugust 2020January 2012Newer by 105 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 VG-160 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VG-160

 E-M10 IV VG-160 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV features outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the VG-160.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and VG-160 is 81 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and VG-160.

All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will render more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography details
Olympus VG-160 Street photography details
84
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
56
lighter than others (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography highlights
72
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
lacks phase detect AF
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (165 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
84
connects via bluetooth
has focus via touch
good resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
65
lighter than others (125g)
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (165 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Landscape photography with Olympus VG-160
82
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
36
really wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery pack (165 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 IV
Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
78
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
missing mic port
30
really wide (26mm)
features face detection focus
lighter than others (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus VG-160
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus VG-160
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2020-08-04 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 7cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.7fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 4.80 m
Flash modes Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383g (0.84 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images 165 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $699 $90