Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 8000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 II was released 6 years later than the 8000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II scores vs the 8000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 8000
E-M10 II | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 75 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
8000 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 8000
E-M10 II | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II vs the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42904/42904381fc62e3cc4052bfae25df2d2bcbb5e061" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and 8000 is 82 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14193/14193156b0bb95c145427c36ec90ca873e940c50" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and 8000.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bb6b/5bb6bba02f5a4dfb25e5933fb9a921f1b5c0efd2" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb215/eb215a8ad6ec7c882330956fd6e9560323f35fee" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $499 | $380 |