Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Released August 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M10 IV was revealed 8 years later than the VR-340 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the VR-340 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus VR-340

 E-M10 IV VR-340 
IntroducedAugust 2020January 2012More recent by 105 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kClearer display (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 VR-340 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VR-340

 E-M10 IV VR-340 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV against the VR-340.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and VR-340 is 81 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and VR-340.

All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography factors
77
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
34
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Street photography factors
84
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
72
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
84
connects via bluetooth
includes focus via touch
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
69
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
no Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography advice
82
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
43
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 IV
Vlogging with Olympus VR-340
78
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not have external mic port
33
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus VR-340
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus VR-340
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2020-08-04 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter rate 8.7 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 4.80 m
Flash options Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383 gr (0.84 lbs) 125 gr (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $699 $130