Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100: A Thorough Real-World Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Selecting the right camera can be a daunting task, especially when the options come from two respected manufacturers like Olympus and Panasonic, both with strong heritage in Micro Four Thirds imaging systems. In this detailed comparison, I draw upon my extensive hands-on testing experience with these cameras to dissect their strengths and limitations across a breadth of photography disciplines and practical use cases. Whether your main focus is portraiture, landscape, wildlife, or video content creation, this analysis is designed to provide a clear understanding of how the Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Panasonic Lumix LX100 perform in real-world conditions - empowering you to make an informed buying decision.

Let's start by examining the physical presence and ergonomics of these two models.

Built to Handle: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling in Real-World Use

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV adopts a classic SLR-style mirrorless body design typical of Olympus' OM-D lineup - compact yet robust. The Panasonic LX100, by contrast, sits as a large-sensor compact camera with a fixed lens, boasting a markedly smaller footprint.

In terms of dimensions, the Olympus measures approximately 122 x 84 x 49 mm, weighing around 383 grams with battery - a lightweight body that still allows for a confident grip, fitting comfortably in one hand. The LX100 is more compact at 115 x 66 x 55 mm and slightly heavier at 393 grams, given its fixed lens assembly.

Handling-wise, the E-M10 IV benefits from a thoughtfully sculpted grip and tactile buttons, facilitating a reliable one-handed operation. Meanwhile, the LX100 offers a minimalist design, with the advantage of a fast zoom lens and intuitive direct control dials, albeit sacrificing the flexibility interchangeable lenses provide.

The Olympus places numerous customizable physical controls within easy reach, including an intuitive mode dial, exposure compensation wheel, and front and rear control dials. The Panasonic LX100 also features physical dials for aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation - boasting a satisfying mechanical feel appealing to users who prefer manual adjustments.

The trade-off between interchangeable versatility and compact convenience is immediately apparent. For photographers valuing lens flexibility and extended shooting scenarios, the Olympus is the better ergonomic fit. On the other hand, the LX100 compacts a capable imaging system in a pocketable form factor - particularly attractive for street or travel use where size and simplicity shine.

Imaging Heart: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

A camera’s sensor is the foundational determinant of image quality, dynamic range, noise performance, and ultimately, creative potential.

Both cameras employ a Four Thirds sensor with very similar physical sizes (approximately 17.3 x 13 mm). However, the Olympus E-M10 IV sports a newly designed 20.3-megapixel CMOS sensor paired with Olympus’ TruePic VIII processing engine. This ensures high-resolution files sized at 5184 x 3888 pixels, putting it in a solid position for cropping and large prints.

The LX100 uses a 13-megapixel Four Thirds CMOS sensor complemented by Panasonic’s Venus Engine processor. The slightly lower pixel count (4112 x 3088 pixels) is intentional, facilitating larger pixel sizes that translate into improved noise control and dynamic range in practical shooting, especially in low light. However, the trade-off is less absolute resolution.

From my lab testing, the Olympus offered slightly better detail resolution advantage, owing to its higher pixel count, which benefits landscape and portrait photographers seeking fine texture rendition. The LX100 performs surprisingly well in highlight retention and color accuracy thanks to Panasonic’s refined in-camera image processing pipeline - although it lags subtly behind the Olympus in shadow noise at higher ISOs.

Both cameras feature anti-alias filters meant to reduce moiré patterns at the slight expense of ultimate resolution sharpness.

The Olympus sensor has a minimum ISO of 200 and can be extended down to ISO 100, with a max native ISO of 25,600 - suitable for a variety of lighting conditions. The LX100 offers the same ISO range but distinguishes itself with cleaner files at ISO 6400 compared to the E-M10 IV, favorable for astrophotography and night shooting.

Viewing and Composing: Screen and Viewfinder Experience

Composition ergonomics significantly affect shooting comfort and accuracy, particularly for moving subjects or long shoots.

The Olympus E-M10 IV boasts a 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD panel with 1,040,000-dot resolution - responding reliably to touch commands such as focus point selection, menu navigation, and image review gestures. The versatile tilt mechanism allows for comfortable low- and high-angle shooting, a huge plus for creative framing.

Conversely, the Panasonic LX100 offers a 3-inch fixed LCD screen with 921,000 dots but lacks touchscreen functionality, limiting interactive control options. This design suits its compact format but reduces flexibility in composition angles and camera handling.

Both cameras provide an electronic viewfinder (EVF), an advantage over entry-level DSLRs. The LX100’s 2,764,000-dot EVF lends itself to sharper, clearer composition, with a slightly higher magnification (0.7x) compared to the Olympus’ 2,360,000-dot EVF at 0.62x magnification. Both cover 100% of the frame, but users tell me the LX100’s EVF has a noticeable edge in contrast and color fidelity, a vital factor for precise focusing and exposure decisions.

Autofocus Systems: Precision, Speed, and Tracking Reliability

For many users, autofocus (AF) capability directly impacts usability across genres like wildlife, sports, and portraits.

The Olympus E-M10 IV uses a contrast-based focusing system with 121 selectable points distributed across the frame, supporting face detection and eye autofocus for humans, a boon for portraiture. It lacks phase-detection AF and animal eye AF, which limits some tracking robustness but retains solid live-view functionality and continuous AF during burst shots (max 8.7 fps).

In contrast, the Panasonic LX100 features a contrast-detection AF system with 49 points, fewer than Olympus but supported by intelligent algorithms for tracking. It also supports face detection and eye AF for human subjects but no animal eye AF.

Hands-on testing reveals the Olympus AF offers snappier and more reliable performance for static and slow-moving subjects, with smooth continuous AF during burst shooting. The LX100 is quicker in burst shooting mode (11 fps max) but sometimes less consistent when tracking erratic movement, particularly in low-light conditions.

How These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres

I have always advocated for testing cameras not only in labs but by subjecting them to diverse, real-world shooting scenarios to reveal their inherent strengths and compromises.

Portraits: Skin Tones and Eye Detection Fidelity

Olympus’ eye detection autofocus reliably locks onto subjects’ eyes, a critical feature for stunning portraits with sharp focus on the face even at wide apertures delivering attractive background blur. The 20MP sensor captures excellent detail and natural skin tones with manageable noise at ISO 800.

The LX100, with its bright fixed zoom lens ranging from f/1.7 to f/2.8, is excellent for low-light portraits and provides pleasing bokeh considering its compact form. Although only 13MP, its larger pixels help render a softer rendition of skin textures, which some users find more flattering. Eye AF performance is competent but less aggressive than Olympus.

Landscape: Dynamic Range and Weather Seal

For landscape photographers, dynamic range and durability are paramount. The Olympus, with its superior pixel count and sensor design, captures landscapes with finer detail, better shadow recovery, and vibrant yet accurate color. Unfortunately, neither camera offers environmental sealing, making them vulnerable to dust and moisture - a crucial consideration for outdoor shooting.

Landscape users will appreciate Olympus’s tilting screen and better battery endurance (approx. 360 shots versus 300 shots for LX100) during extended field sessions.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Tracking and Burst Rates

While the Olympus E-M10 IV’s slower burst shooting rate (8.7 fps) slightly limits action capture in fast-paced sports or wildlife, its AF tracking is more dependable under varied lighting. The LX100’s faster 11 fps burst is helpful for fleeting action, though its AF may lose track more easily.

Telephoto reach favors Olympus users thanks to the interchangeable Micro Four Thirds lenses offering up to 600mm (equivalent) options, critical for wildlife and sports photographers requiring distance versatility.

Street and Travel Photography: Discreteness, Portability, and Battery Life

Street photographers often prize unobtrusiveness and portability. The LX100’s fixed lens compact design shines here, easily slipping into a jacket pocket without fuss, allowing candid shooting without intimidation. Yet, the Olympus remains pocketable for those preferring an interchangeable lens system.

Battery life also matters on the go: Olympus edges out at 360 shots per charge compared to the LX100’s 300, although both require spare batteries for serious travel.

Macro, Night, and Video Capabilities Compared

Macro Photography

Neither camera is designed specifically for macro, but Olympus’s larger Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem offers dedicated macro optics with high magnification and stabilization support. The LX100’s fixed lens can approach 3 cm focusing distance but lacks the raw extension of Olympus’s system for high precision.

Night and Astro

When shooting at night or capturing star fields, Olympus’s higher pixel count comes with moderate noise increase at ISO 1600+. The LX100 excels in high-ISO noise suppression, thanks to larger pixels and advanced noise reduction processing, making it preferable for astro and nightscape photographers prioritizing cleaner files.

Video Quality and Features

Both models record 4K UHD video at 30p, but with differences.

• Olympus E-M10 IV shoots 4K video at up to 102 Mbps in H.264 with Linear PCM audio. It lacks a microphone input but includes sensor-shift 5-axis image stabilization that significantly smooths handheld footage.
• Panasonic LX100 also outputs 4K video at 30p, recording in AVCHD and MPEG-4; however, it lacks a built-in mic input and depends on optical stabilization. It features 4K photo mode, capturing 8 MP stills at 30 fps for action freeze.

While neither caters fully to professional videographers, Olympus offers a slightly more versatile video experience through superior in-body stabilization.

Build Quality, Lens Ecosystem, and Connectivity

Neither Olympus E-M10 IV nor Panasonic LX100 offers weather sealing or ruggedized builds, which limits use under harsh environments - worth noting for professionals requiring reliability.

Lens compatibility is a decisive factor: Olympus leverages the extensive Micro Four Thirds lens lineup (over 100 native lenses), letting users tailor focal lengths and aperture to creative needs. Panasonic LX100’s fixed lens precludes lens swapping but provides a versatile 24-75mm equivalent range with fast aperture - ideal for generalist use without extra gear.

Olympus supports USB 2.0, Bluetooth, and built-in Wi-Fi for remote control and image transfer. Panasonic also supports Wi-Fi and includes NFC for quick pairing, although it lacks Bluetooth.

Battery and Storage: Endurance in the Field

Olympus E-M10 IV and Panasonic LX100 accept a single SD card, but the former supports the faster UHS-II standard, benefiting workflows needing rapid write speeds (burst multi-frame RAW writes, 4K video).

Battery performance favors Olympus by approximately 20%, delivering around 360 shots per charge versus 300 with LX100 - still requiring additional batteries for extended sessions.

Price vs Performance: Which One Delivers the Best Bang?

Both cameras target mid-tier budgets with Olympus retailing near $700 and the LX100 closer to $800. The Olympus offers more flexibility due to its lens mount and newer sensor, often representing better value for photographers aiming to expand or enter into interchangeable lens systems with a capable entry-level body.

The Panasonic LX100 caters to enthusiasts desiring high-quality imaging in a compact, travel-friendly camera with an excellent lens but no flexibility to grow beyond its fixed optics.

Consolidated Scores: Overall and Genre-Specific Performance

See below an overview of how each camera stacks up in terms of overall and discipline-specific performance based on my comprehensive field tests.

Real-World Sample Images Comparisons

To illustrate the practical imaging differences, below is a gallery of side-by-side sample shots from both cameras - covering portrait, landscape, and low-light scenarios.

Olympus E M10 IV front Olympus E M10 IV screen back Panasonic LX100 front Panasonic LX100 screen back

Notice the Olympus images exhibiting marginally finer detail and texture, while Panasonic files show cleaner high-ISO noise profiles, particularly in shadow areas.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?

After rigorous evaluation, here is my advice tailored across user profiles:

• Enthusiast Photographers Prioritizing Versatility and Expandability: The Olympus E-M10 IV stands out with a modern sensor, extensive lens options, advanced autofocus, and user-friendly ergonomics, making it ideal for portraits, landscapes, macro, and travel. Its superior in-body stabilization and touchscreen usability further enhance the experience.

• Street Photographers and Travelers Seeking Portability: The Panasonic LX100, with its bright fixed zoom lens and pocketable design, excels where discreetness and simplicity matter most. Its superior EVF, quick burst rate, and excellent low-light imaging make it a compelling all-in-one compact camera.

• Video Creators on a Budget: Olympus wins with enhanced 5-axis stabilization and higher bitrate 4K video, although limitations like no microphone input affect professional video work.

• Wildlife and Sports Shooters Needing Lens Flexibility: Olympus' support for long telephoto lenses and reliable AF tracking provide a clear advantage, despite a slightly slower burst speed.

In summary, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV is a solid, flexible entry-level mirrorless camera that offers excellent value for photographers committed to growth and diverse shooting styles, while the Panasonic LX100 is a sophisticated high-skill compact that delivers quality imaging in a conveniently small format.

Choosing between these two cameras comes down to your shooting priorities: do you want an expandable system with intuitive controls and sensor improvements, or do you prefer a premium compact with a sharp lens and portability? Both cameras showcase Panasonic and Olympus’s engineering strengths in Micro Four Thirds, each carving a distinct niche tailored to varied photographic ambitions.

I encourage prospective buyers to test these cameras hands-on if possible, carefully weighing form factor, handling, and preferred genres to find the best personal match.

If you found this comparison useful, feel free to share and follow for deeper insights into camera technologies and their practical photographic applications.