Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31753/31753135b8cedc7114ec1b04d3acdf66da76f921" alt="Pentax K-5 II front Pentax K-5 II front"
60 Imaging
57 Features
82 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Old Model is Pentax K-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and K-5 II (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and K-5 II (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was introduced 7 years after the K-5 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-5 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the K-5 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Pentax K-5 II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Pentax K-5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Pentax K-5 II
E-M10 IV | K-5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | ![]() | June 2013 | More modern by 88 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 II over the Olympus E-M10 IV
K-5 II | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Pentax K-5 II
E-M10 IV | K-5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Pentax K-5 II has sizing of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") and a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the K-5 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7853e/7853e25f76a20c71c11f414aa30945669ccdc619" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and K-5 II is 81 and 60 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1399d/1399d9f9358b8ad23c7b6a3a234c113b7ccd1e82" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and K-5 II.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-M10 IV will resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4db41/4db41b4cd8b74dbd5c45a32df5be8864611e89e0" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef58/eef583513a8e15621698516a14a00f24f4984779" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K-5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K-5 II |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2013-06-04 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 pounds) | 760g (1.68 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1235 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 980 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $699 | $830 |