Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88116/88116e64f46e39b4199ab42d569c8a4fa375dbc2" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front"
69 Imaging
50 Features
40 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the A230 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A230 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The XZ-1 was announced 21 months after the A230 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-1 scores vs the A230 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A230. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Sony A230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A230
XZ-1 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus XZ-1
A230 | XZ-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A230
XZ-1 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A230 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the A230.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed9a4/ed9a4310a61fc50f2c0a7ce5335078360265635e" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and A230 is 88 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beda0/beda09d7c91f1841ec98daabbf305574ba575fb7" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and A230.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-1 has got the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF trickier. The newer XZ-1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4324/e4324481f47995ad7a2978b6491c42b6762d5850" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42e5c/42e5c9c2288fe9c34e44619b5c649d5921b21a21" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 490 grams (1.08 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 34 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 230 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $567 | $569 |