Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Old Model is Sony A200
  • Replacement is Sony A290
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the A230 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A230 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XZ-1 was announced 21 months after the A230 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-1 scores vs the A230 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A230

 XZ-1 A230 
LaunchedJanuary 2011May 2009More modern by 21 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution614k230kCrisper screen (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus XZ-1

 A230 XZ-1 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A230

 XZ-1 A230 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A230 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the A230.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and A230 is 88 and 69 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and A230.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-1 has got the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF trickier. The newer XZ-1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
Sony A230 Portrait photography info
45
has manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
54
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography information
Sony A230 Street photography information
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
heavier than competition (275g)
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography details
Sony A230 Sports photography details
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
good battery (320 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
low battery (230 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography info
Sony A230 Travel photography info
62
good battery (320 per charge)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (275 grams)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
45
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low battery (230 CIPA)
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
Landscape photography with Sony A230
54
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
missing Time Lapse recording
51
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no liveview
low megapixels (10MP)
low battery (230 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
Sony A230 Vlogging details
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
heavier than competition (275g)
9
lack of video recording
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A230
 Olympus XZ-1Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2011-01-26 2009-05-18
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2752 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 614k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lbs) 490 grams (1.08 lbs)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 34 63
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 11.4
DXO Low light rating 117 531
Other
Battery life 320 shots 230 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $567 $569