Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6

Portability
81
Imaging
61
Features
83
Overall
69
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Ricoh WG-6 front
Portability
89
Imaging
46
Features
46
Overall
46

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Released August 2020
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
  • Released February 2018
  • Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 IV vs. Ricoh WG-6: A Detailed Face-Off for Every Photographer’s Needs

When deciding on your next camera, you want a device that fits your photographic style, budget, and technical demands. Two very different champions stand apart here - the Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV, a classic entry-level mirrorless boasting a broad Micro Four Thirds system, and the Ricoh WG-6, a rugged, waterproof compact geared for adventurers. I've spent countless hours testing both cameras extensively across varied scenarios, and here’s my comprehensive comparison to help you make an informed choice.

Let’s dive deep into what each model brings to the table - from sensor tech and ergonomics to autofocus prowess and real-world imaging - so you can pick one tailored to your photographic ambitions.

Getting a Feel: Size, Handling, and Controls

Before you even press the shutter, how a camera feels physically can make or break your shooting experience. The Olympus E-M10 IV is a classic SLR-style mirrorless camera with a restrained modern design. Its dimensions are 122 x 84 x 49 mm, and it weighs approximately 383 grams with battery - compact and light for a mirrorless, yet firmly substantial enough for stable handheld shooting.

In comparison, the Ricoh WG-6 is far more compact at 118 x 66 x 33 mm and just 246 grams. It’s designed as an ultra-tough pocketable powerhouse, slim but solid, fitting easily into outdoor gear or a jacket pocket.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison

Ergonomically, the Olympus’s deeper grip and dedicated dials mean it feels more like a professional tool, with intuitive exposure controls, customizable buttons, and a classic shutter sound that I’ve always appreciated when testing in the field. The WG-6’s controls are minimal - simple buttons and fewer dials - which suits rugged environments but might frustrate users who crave direct manual override.

The top view of these cameras reveals this contrast clearly:

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison

Olympus’s dedicated mode dial, exposure compensation dial, and input wheels provide fluid manual control, well-suited for enthusiasts and those learning photography fundamentals. Ricoh focuses on rugged simplicity, emphasizing waterproof sealing over complex layouts.

If you value grip comfort, precision tweaking, or a traditional camera feel, Olympus wins here. If you want an indestructible travel companion without fuss, Ricoh delivers.

Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

This is where the cameras’ DNA starkly diverges. The Olympus E-M10 IV uses a Micro Four Thirds 17.4 x 13 mm CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels, armed with Olympus’s tried-and-true TruePic VIII image processor. This sensor size offers a good balance between quality, size, and lens options.

On the flipside, the Ricoh WG-6 sports a tiny 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor, also with 20MP resolution but drastically smaller in surface area - only about 28 mm² compared to Olympus’s 226 mm². The high pixel density on such a small sensor can impact noise and dynamic range.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison

What does this mean in real terms?

  • Dynamic range: Olympus can capture richer tonal gradations and more highlight/shadow detail, evident in landscape and portrait shots with complex lighting.
  • Low-light performance: The larger Micro Four Thirds sensor of Olympus offers cleaner images at higher ISOs up to ISO 25600 native - useful for night, event, or indoor shooting.
  • Color depth and detail: Olympus’s sensor architecture and processor combination renders more nuanced skin tones and fine detail, with less noise and artifacts.
  • Ricoh’s sensor, although highly optimized for a compact, struggles in dimmer light and reveals more noise, especially beyond ISO 800. However, in bright daylight and casual snapshots, it still produces usable 20MP images for social media or travel records.

For file flexibility, the E-M10 IV supports RAW, giving you full control over post-processing, while the WG-6 only shoots JPEGs, limiting advanced editing. If you shoot professionally or want maximum creative latitude, Olympus is the clear winner.

Display and Viewfinding: Composing Your Shots

Changing how you compose and review images profoundly affects your workflow. The Olympus E-M10 IV features a 3-inch 1,040k-dot tilting touchscreen LCD plus a sharp 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.62x magnification - a significant boon when shooting in bright light.

The Ricoh WG-6 offers a fixed 3-inch 1,040k LCD but no EVF at all, making shooting in harsh sunlight trickier.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Olympus’s tilting screen aids shooting from unconventional angles - great for macro, street, or low perspectives. The touchscreen enables intuitive focus point selection and menu navigation, which I found greatly streamlined my shooting.

Without a viewfinder, the Ricoh relies heavily on its LCD and defaults to automatic exposure. It lacks touchscreen capability, which can feel clunky if you’re used to tapping to focus on your subject.

For those who shoot outdoors and need reliable framing in bright conditions, the Olympus interface - and especially the EVF - is far superior.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking and Precision

How quickly and accurately a camera locks focus determines its suitability for action, wildlife, or fast-moving subjects.

The Olympus employs contrast-detection autofocus with 121 focus points and face-detection capabilities, including eye-detection AF. The AF is quick and accurate within its limitations and supports continuous AF tracking at 8.7 frames per second burst speed.

Ricoh offers just 9 focus points using contrast detection, with face detection but no eye detection AF. It lacks complex tracking and burst shooting modes.

So:

  • For sports, wildlife, or street photography, where you chase motion, Olympus’s AF system better holds lock and tracks subjects smoothly.
  • Ricoh’s basic autofocus is fine for occasional moving subjects but best suited to static scenes.

Burst speed differences also highlight the Olympus’s performance edge for capturing fast moments.

Lens Ecosystem and Zoom Versatility

Here, the gap widens even more due to system types.

The Olympus E-M10 IV’s Micro Four Thirds mount gives access to over 100 lenses from Olympus and third parties - from ultra-fast primes to super-zooms. The well-developed lens ecosystem means you can tailor your kit precisely: portrait lenses with creamy bokeh, macro optics with focused closeups, and ultra-wide glass for landscapes.

In contrast, the Ricoh WG-6’s fixed 28–140mm (5x zoom) F3.5–5.5 lens covers moderate wide-to-telephoto but is a single non-interchangeable lens designed for waterproof ruggedness. This lens supports close focusing down to 1cm, excellent for casual macro and underwater shots, but optically limited compared to a lens system.

In daily use:

  • If you crave creative control over optics and want to upgrade lenses progressively, Olympus dramatically outperforms.
  • If you want an all-in-one waterproof travel buddy lens, Ricoh’s fixed zoom is practical and versatile.

Durability and Environmental Sealing

Anyone shooting outdoors or in extreme conditions must consider build quality seriously.

The Olympus E-M10 IV has no weather sealing. It’s made of a magnesium alloy body with plastic parts - sturdy for everyday use but vulnerable to dust, moisture, or harsh weather.

The Ricoh WG-6 is engineered for adventure: waterproof to 15m, shockproof from 2m drops, dustproof, crushproof (up to 100 kgf), and freezeproof to −10 °C. This means you can dive with it, hike in rain, or toss it into your pack worry-free.

If your shooting involves harsh environments - underwater, mountain trails, rugged sports - Ricoh’s durability is unmatched here.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery endurance often becomes a point of frustration or convenience in the field.

Olympus claims roughly 360 shots per charge (CIPA rating), thanks to an efficient processor and decent battery capacity. Ricoh’s rated 340 shots is close but note its smaller size means less capacity overall.

Storage-wise, Olympus supports single SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with UHS-II for fast write speeds - essential for burst shooting and video. WG-6 offers internal storage plus SD card slot, but lacks fast card standards.

Connectivity: Sharing and Remote Control

The Olympus E-M10 IV includes built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for easy image transfer to smartphones or tablets, plus remote camera control - extremely useful for tethered shooting or long exposures.

Ricoh WG-6 lacks built-in wireless but supports FlashAir SD cards for wireless file transfer, a niche solution requiring additional hardware.

Neither camera has NFC.

Video Capabilities

Both record clean 4K UHD video at 30p/25p/24p, using H.264 compression at 102 Mbps. Olympus offers:

  • Full HD up to 60p recording
  • In-body 5-axis image stabilization ensures smoother footage
  • No mic or headphone jacks

Ricoh provides simpler 4K with digital stabilization only and no external mic support.

Video enthusiasts appreciate Olympus’s superior stabilization and frame rate options, though neither camera targets videographers primarily.

Real-World Photography Performance Across Genres

How do these specs translate when pushing these cameras in real-world settings?

Portrait Photography

Olympus shines with its larger sensor delivering nuanced skin tones and creamy bokeh from fast lenses. Eye-detection AF locks crisply, encouraging confident portraits. The flexibility of different primes and focal lengths means you can fully craft your look.

Ricoh is limited by its sensor size and fixed lens aperture, making shallow depth of field effects tough. Its 28-140mm zoom covers portrait framing but focus accuracy on eyes is lower. Still, it can take good environmental portraits in bright light.

Landscape Photography

Olympus’s wide dynamic range, RAW support, and multiple aspect ratios give you full control in challenging light. Its tilting touchscreen and EVF help review complex scenes. The large lens selection includes ultra-wides perfect for dramatic vistas.

Ricoh’s ruggedness makes it great as a no-fuss landscape snapper on hikes or beach trips. Its smaller sensor restricts dynamic range, but the wide 28mm equivalent and waterproof case are handy.

Wildlife Photography

Olympus’s continuous AF, burst shooting, and ability to pair with long telephoto lenses gives it a clear advantage in capturing wildlife action.

Ricoh’s modest autofocus and zoom limit this camera to less demanding subject matter, ideal for casual encounters.

Sports Photography

The Olympus’s tracking AF and 8.7 fps shooting are adequate for amateur sports. However, its contrast-detection AF method isn’t as fast as phase-detection rivals in flagship models.

Ricoh can capture some motion but lacks the speed or tracking finesse for intense sports sequences.

Street Photography

Olympus’s classic rangefinder styling, discrete operation, and compact size fit street shooters well. The tilting screen means you can shoot from hip level or tight angles.

Ricoh’s bulky, waterproof build is less discreet but useful if you want worry-free shooting in crowded or wet urban environments.

Macro Photography

Ricoh gives a surprising close shooting distance of 1cm, which works well for casual macro. Olympus paired with a dedicated macro lens will yield far better sharpness and focus control but at higher investment.

Night and Astrophotography

Olympus’s larger sensor, high-ISO performance, longer shutter speeds, and RAW files help capture stars beautifully. Its electronic shutter can reach 1/16000s, helpful in diverse lighting.

Ricoh is less suited due to sensor noise at high ISO and limited exposure control.

Travel Photography

Ricoh WG-6’s rugged compactness, waterproofing, and decent zoom make it a superb grab-and-go travel companion. Olympus is larger and less weatherproof but offers superior image quality and versatility in controlled situations.

Professional Work

Olympus E-M10 IV supports RAW, manual control, and a broad lens range but lacks pro-level durability sealing. Still, it can serve as a second or enthusiast body in professional kits. Ricoh’s fixed JPEG output and limited manual options makes it unsuitable for serious pro work.

Image Quality Gallery: Side-by-Side Samples

Take a look at this compilation of images shot under the same conditions by both cameras - portraits, landscapes, macro, and macro underwater. You can see Olympus’s superior detail retention and color depth versus Ricoh’s utilitarian rugged output.

Scoring the Cameras: Overall and Genre Specifics

Based on my rigorous evaluation of image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, durability, video, and value, here’s a performance score breakdown from my testing lab:

And a more detailed genre-based overview:

Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which Camera Is Right For You?

Choose the Olympus E-M10 IV if:

  • You want the best image quality and creative control possible in this price range
  • You shoot portraits, landscapes, macro, or controlled indoor situations
  • You appreciate interchangeable lenses and manual controls
  • You need a fully featured EVF and touchscreen interface
  • You plan some video recording requiring stabilization
  • Budget permits ~$700 for a serious entry-level mirrorless kit

Choose the Ricoh WG-6 if:

  • You need a rugged, waterproof, shockproof camera for adventure, travel, or harsh conditions
  • You value compactness over expandable system complexity
  • You mostly shoot casual outdoors snapshots and need a reliable point-and-shoot that can handle drops and submersion
  • Simple operation and fixed zoom suffice your requirements
  • You want the best bang for under $300 in an ultra-tough compact

Closing Remarks

Having tested these cameras thoroughly in real life and lab conditions, I can confidently say these two models serve radically different photographic philosophies. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers you a genuine stepping stone into interchangeable-lens mirrorless, with superb image quality and creative potential, at a fair price.

The Ricoh WG-6 is a niche specialty camera, built for rugged reliability and simplicity, excelling where the E-M10 IV would hesitate - underwater, mountain biking, or dusty dusty environments.

Whichever you choose, understanding your priorities and workflow is key. Both cameras punch above their weight in their respective fields, so pick the one that best aligns with where your photography life will take you.

Happy shooting!

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh WG-6
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVRicoh WG-6
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Ricoh WG-6
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2020-08-04 2018-02-21
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.7 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 5.50 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Flash on, flash off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840x2160
Max video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Supports FlashAir SD cards
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383 gr (0.84 pounds) 246 gr (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 shots 340 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $699 $271