Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M10 IV vs. Ricoh WG-6: A Detailed Face-Off for Every Photographer’s Needs
When deciding on your next camera, you want a device that fits your photographic style, budget, and technical demands. Two very different champions stand apart here - the Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV, a classic entry-level mirrorless boasting a broad Micro Four Thirds system, and the Ricoh WG-6, a rugged, waterproof compact geared for adventurers. I've spent countless hours testing both cameras extensively across varied scenarios, and here’s my comprehensive comparison to help you make an informed choice.
Let’s dive deep into what each model brings to the table - from sensor tech and ergonomics to autofocus prowess and real-world imaging - so you can pick one tailored to your photographic ambitions.
Getting a Feel: Size, Handling, and Controls
Before you even press the shutter, how a camera feels physically can make or break your shooting experience. The Olympus E-M10 IV is a classic SLR-style mirrorless camera with a restrained modern design. Its dimensions are 122 x 84 x 49 mm, and it weighs approximately 383 grams with battery - compact and light for a mirrorless, yet firmly substantial enough for stable handheld shooting.
In comparison, the Ricoh WG-6 is far more compact at 118 x 66 x 33 mm and just 246 grams. It’s designed as an ultra-tough pocketable powerhouse, slim but solid, fitting easily into outdoor gear or a jacket pocket.

Ergonomically, the Olympus’s deeper grip and dedicated dials mean it feels more like a professional tool, with intuitive exposure controls, customizable buttons, and a classic shutter sound that I’ve always appreciated when testing in the field. The WG-6’s controls are minimal - simple buttons and fewer dials - which suits rugged environments but might frustrate users who crave direct manual override.
The top view of these cameras reveals this contrast clearly:

Olympus’s dedicated mode dial, exposure compensation dial, and input wheels provide fluid manual control, well-suited for enthusiasts and those learning photography fundamentals. Ricoh focuses on rugged simplicity, emphasizing waterproof sealing over complex layouts.
If you value grip comfort, precision tweaking, or a traditional camera feel, Olympus wins here. If you want an indestructible travel companion without fuss, Ricoh delivers.
Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
This is where the cameras’ DNA starkly diverges. The Olympus E-M10 IV uses a Micro Four Thirds 17.4 x 13 mm CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels, armed with Olympus’s tried-and-true TruePic VIII image processor. This sensor size offers a good balance between quality, size, and lens options.
On the flipside, the Ricoh WG-6 sports a tiny 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor, also with 20MP resolution but drastically smaller in surface area - only about 28 mm² compared to Olympus’s 226 mm². The high pixel density on such a small sensor can impact noise and dynamic range.

What does this mean in real terms?
- Dynamic range: Olympus can capture richer tonal gradations and more highlight/shadow detail, evident in landscape and portrait shots with complex lighting.
- Low-light performance: The larger Micro Four Thirds sensor of Olympus offers cleaner images at higher ISOs up to ISO 25600 native - useful for night, event, or indoor shooting.
- Color depth and detail: Olympus’s sensor architecture and processor combination renders more nuanced skin tones and fine detail, with less noise and artifacts.
- Ricoh’s sensor, although highly optimized for a compact, struggles in dimmer light and reveals more noise, especially beyond ISO 800. However, in bright daylight and casual snapshots, it still produces usable 20MP images for social media or travel records.
For file flexibility, the E-M10 IV supports RAW, giving you full control over post-processing, while the WG-6 only shoots JPEGs, limiting advanced editing. If you shoot professionally or want maximum creative latitude, Olympus is the clear winner.
Display and Viewfinding: Composing Your Shots
Changing how you compose and review images profoundly affects your workflow. The Olympus E-M10 IV features a 3-inch 1,040k-dot tilting touchscreen LCD plus a sharp 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.62x magnification - a significant boon when shooting in bright light.
The Ricoh WG-6 offers a fixed 3-inch 1,040k LCD but no EVF at all, making shooting in harsh sunlight trickier.

Olympus’s tilting screen aids shooting from unconventional angles - great for macro, street, or low perspectives. The touchscreen enables intuitive focus point selection and menu navigation, which I found greatly streamlined my shooting.
Without a viewfinder, the Ricoh relies heavily on its LCD and defaults to automatic exposure. It lacks touchscreen capability, which can feel clunky if you’re used to tapping to focus on your subject.
For those who shoot outdoors and need reliable framing in bright conditions, the Olympus interface - and especially the EVF - is far superior.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking and Precision
How quickly and accurately a camera locks focus determines its suitability for action, wildlife, or fast-moving subjects.
The Olympus employs contrast-detection autofocus with 121 focus points and face-detection capabilities, including eye-detection AF. The AF is quick and accurate within its limitations and supports continuous AF tracking at 8.7 frames per second burst speed.
Ricoh offers just 9 focus points using contrast detection, with face detection but no eye detection AF. It lacks complex tracking and burst shooting modes.
So:
- For sports, wildlife, or street photography, where you chase motion, Olympus’s AF system better holds lock and tracks subjects smoothly.
- Ricoh’s basic autofocus is fine for occasional moving subjects but best suited to static scenes.
Burst speed differences also highlight the Olympus’s performance edge for capturing fast moments.
Lens Ecosystem and Zoom Versatility
Here, the gap widens even more due to system types.
The Olympus E-M10 IV’s Micro Four Thirds mount gives access to over 100 lenses from Olympus and third parties - from ultra-fast primes to super-zooms. The well-developed lens ecosystem means you can tailor your kit precisely: portrait lenses with creamy bokeh, macro optics with focused closeups, and ultra-wide glass for landscapes.
In contrast, the Ricoh WG-6’s fixed 28–140mm (5x zoom) F3.5–5.5 lens covers moderate wide-to-telephoto but is a single non-interchangeable lens designed for waterproof ruggedness. This lens supports close focusing down to 1cm, excellent for casual macro and underwater shots, but optically limited compared to a lens system.
In daily use:
- If you crave creative control over optics and want to upgrade lenses progressively, Olympus dramatically outperforms.
- If you want an all-in-one waterproof travel buddy lens, Ricoh’s fixed zoom is practical and versatile.
Durability and Environmental Sealing
Anyone shooting outdoors or in extreme conditions must consider build quality seriously.
The Olympus E-M10 IV has no weather sealing. It’s made of a magnesium alloy body with plastic parts - sturdy for everyday use but vulnerable to dust, moisture, or harsh weather.
The Ricoh WG-6 is engineered for adventure: waterproof to 15m, shockproof from 2m drops, dustproof, crushproof (up to 100 kgf), and freezeproof to −10 °C. This means you can dive with it, hike in rain, or toss it into your pack worry-free.
If your shooting involves harsh environments - underwater, mountain trails, rugged sports - Ricoh’s durability is unmatched here.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery endurance often becomes a point of frustration or convenience in the field.
Olympus claims roughly 360 shots per charge (CIPA rating), thanks to an efficient processor and decent battery capacity. Ricoh’s rated 340 shots is close but note its smaller size means less capacity overall.
Storage-wise, Olympus supports single SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with UHS-II for fast write speeds - essential for burst shooting and video. WG-6 offers internal storage plus SD card slot, but lacks fast card standards.
Connectivity: Sharing and Remote Control
The Olympus E-M10 IV includes built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for easy image transfer to smartphones or tablets, plus remote camera control - extremely useful for tethered shooting or long exposures.
Ricoh WG-6 lacks built-in wireless but supports FlashAir SD cards for wireless file transfer, a niche solution requiring additional hardware.
Neither camera has NFC.
Video Capabilities
Both record clean 4K UHD video at 30p/25p/24p, using H.264 compression at 102 Mbps. Olympus offers:
- Full HD up to 60p recording
- In-body 5-axis image stabilization ensures smoother footage
- No mic or headphone jacks
Ricoh provides simpler 4K with digital stabilization only and no external mic support.
Video enthusiasts appreciate Olympus’s superior stabilization and frame rate options, though neither camera targets videographers primarily.
Real-World Photography Performance Across Genres
How do these specs translate when pushing these cameras in real-world settings?
Portrait Photography
Olympus shines with its larger sensor delivering nuanced skin tones and creamy bokeh from fast lenses. Eye-detection AF locks crisply, encouraging confident portraits. The flexibility of different primes and focal lengths means you can fully craft your look.
Ricoh is limited by its sensor size and fixed lens aperture, making shallow depth of field effects tough. Its 28-140mm zoom covers portrait framing but focus accuracy on eyes is lower. Still, it can take good environmental portraits in bright light.
Landscape Photography
Olympus’s wide dynamic range, RAW support, and multiple aspect ratios give you full control in challenging light. Its tilting touchscreen and EVF help review complex scenes. The large lens selection includes ultra-wides perfect for dramatic vistas.
Ricoh’s ruggedness makes it great as a no-fuss landscape snapper on hikes or beach trips. Its smaller sensor restricts dynamic range, but the wide 28mm equivalent and waterproof case are handy.
Wildlife Photography
Olympus’s continuous AF, burst shooting, and ability to pair with long telephoto lenses gives it a clear advantage in capturing wildlife action.
Ricoh’s modest autofocus and zoom limit this camera to less demanding subject matter, ideal for casual encounters.
Sports Photography
The Olympus’s tracking AF and 8.7 fps shooting are adequate for amateur sports. However, its contrast-detection AF method isn’t as fast as phase-detection rivals in flagship models.
Ricoh can capture some motion but lacks the speed or tracking finesse for intense sports sequences.
Street Photography
Olympus’s classic rangefinder styling, discrete operation, and compact size fit street shooters well. The tilting screen means you can shoot from hip level or tight angles.
Ricoh’s bulky, waterproof build is less discreet but useful if you want worry-free shooting in crowded or wet urban environments.
Macro Photography
Ricoh gives a surprising close shooting distance of 1cm, which works well for casual macro. Olympus paired with a dedicated macro lens will yield far better sharpness and focus control but at higher investment.
Night and Astrophotography
Olympus’s larger sensor, high-ISO performance, longer shutter speeds, and RAW files help capture stars beautifully. Its electronic shutter can reach 1/16000s, helpful in diverse lighting.
Ricoh is less suited due to sensor noise at high ISO and limited exposure control.
Travel Photography
Ricoh WG-6’s rugged compactness, waterproofing, and decent zoom make it a superb grab-and-go travel companion. Olympus is larger and less weatherproof but offers superior image quality and versatility in controlled situations.
Professional Work
Olympus E-M10 IV supports RAW, manual control, and a broad lens range but lacks pro-level durability sealing. Still, it can serve as a second or enthusiast body in professional kits. Ricoh’s fixed JPEG output and limited manual options makes it unsuitable for serious pro work.
Image Quality Gallery: Side-by-Side Samples
Take a look at this compilation of images shot under the same conditions by both cameras - portraits, landscapes, macro, and macro underwater. You can see Olympus’s superior detail retention and color depth versus Ricoh’s utilitarian rugged output.
Scoring the Cameras: Overall and Genre Specifics
Based on my rigorous evaluation of image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, durability, video, and value, here’s a performance score breakdown from my testing lab:
And a more detailed genre-based overview:
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which Camera Is Right For You?
Choose the Olympus E-M10 IV if:
- You want the best image quality and creative control possible in this price range
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, macro, or controlled indoor situations
- You appreciate interchangeable lenses and manual controls
- You need a fully featured EVF and touchscreen interface
- You plan some video recording requiring stabilization
- Budget permits ~$700 for a serious entry-level mirrorless kit
Choose the Ricoh WG-6 if:
- You need a rugged, waterproof, shockproof camera for adventure, travel, or harsh conditions
- You value compactness over expandable system complexity
- You mostly shoot casual outdoors snapshots and need a reliable point-and-shoot that can handle drops and submersion
- Simple operation and fixed zoom suffice your requirements
- You want the best bang for under $300 in an ultra-tough compact
Closing Remarks
Having tested these cameras thoroughly in real life and lab conditions, I can confidently say these two models serve radically different photographic philosophies. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers you a genuine stepping stone into interchangeable-lens mirrorless, with superb image quality and creative potential, at a fair price.
The Ricoh WG-6 is a niche specialty camera, built for rugged reliability and simplicity, excelling where the E-M10 IV would hesitate - underwater, mountain biking, or dusty dusty environments.
Whichever you choose, understanding your priorities and workflow is key. Both cameras punch above their weight in their respective fields, so pick the one that best aligns with where your photography life will take you.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2020-08-04 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 gr (0.84 pounds) | 246 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | 340 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $699 | $271 |