Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Sony S930 versus Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S930 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S930 was announced 4 years before the TX200V which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Sony S930 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S930 grades against the TX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Sony S930 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Sony TX200V
S930 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony S930
TX200V | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months | |
Display sizing | 3.3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 112k | Sharper display (+1118k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sony S930 and Sony TX200V
S930 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sony S930 enjoys outside measurements of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Sony S930 versus Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S930 vs the TX200V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S930 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S930 and TX200V.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to produce greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged S930 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony S930 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-108mm (2.8x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-5.4 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.4" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 112k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 320x240 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $219 | $500 |