Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b31b/8b31be1d171901c47c29c4d3d1f467acc72bdb7d" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 front"
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-162mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 111g - 97 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the W810 (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and W810 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was released 6 years later than the W810 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W810 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M10 IV matches up vs the W810 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Sony W810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony W810
E-M10 IV | W810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2014 | More recent by 81 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W810 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
W810 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony W810
E-M10 IV | W810 |
---|
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Sony W810 has measurements of 97mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the W810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2291/d229184d8edc992c7183b07049b715ea12a97b83" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and W810 is 81 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a6f/b6a6f484cbe0f57db157a2eeee6dcbceb88b3bf9" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and W810.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The more modern E-M10 IV is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e684/2e6849be1a6480384ed9addbfb8169cb368033a5" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/789ce/789cec0ab8ea5dab6c389c5a9daebabfbf69b2b6" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony W810 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2020-08-04 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-162mm (6.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.7 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.20 m (with ISO auto) |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 lbs) | 111g (0.24 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 97 x 56 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 200 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $699 | $100 |