Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed39c86a4f12fb37f0ee7bf73ec9c47fc264c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SH-1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SH-1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 III was unveiled 3 years after the SH-1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 III grades vs the SH-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SH-1
E-M10 III | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | March 2014 | More modern by 42 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
SH-1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SH-1
E-M10 III | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SH-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the SH-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae5ac/ae5ac02aaf3096bdd8442582892e856ee0389d61" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and SH-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1287d/1287d59e195f3c2cf3ec1ccdcf7895f91322a0ad" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SH-1.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M10 III uses the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier. The newer E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/face1/face162c4e89f50d1cf6a29268fa4c3da21ba04e" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac04d/ac04d1420d99454ee4864e928b79a30ba8653d60" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 380 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $650 | $349 |