Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus SH-1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • New Model is Olympus SH-2
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Overview

Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SH-1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SH-1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 III was unveiled 3 years after the SH-1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 III grades vs the SH-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SH-1

 E-M10 III SH-1 
AnnouncedAugust 2017March 2014More modern by 42 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 SH-1 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SH-1

 E-M10 III SH-1 
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SH-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the SH-1.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and SH-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SH-1.

Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M10 III uses the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier. The newer E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Olympus SH-1 Portrait photography factors
73
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
exports RAW files
37
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography features
Olympus SH-1 Street photography features
77
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competitors in class (410 grams)
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides touch focus
lighter than others in class (271g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Olympus SH-1
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
does not have phase detect auto focus
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
good battery (380 CIPA)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Olympus SH-1
67
provides focus by touch
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
display isn't selfie friendly
74
good battery (380 CIPA)
lighter than others in class (271g)
provides touch focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Olympus SH-1 Landscape photography details
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
49
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good battery (380 per charge)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging features
Olympus SH-1 Vlogging features
32
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
37
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic jack
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SH-1
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus Stylus SH-1
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus Stylus SH-1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2017-08-31 2014-03-31
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410g (0.90 pounds) 271g (0.60 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 380 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $650 $349