Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was revealed 4 years later than the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 57 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III
TG-630 iHS | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III against the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TG-630 iHS is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and TG-630 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $650 | $200 |