Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus VG-145 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Overview

The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M10 III was unveiled 6 years after the VG-145 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 III scores vs the VG-145 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus VG-145

 E-M10 III VG-145 
IntroducedAugust 2017July 2011Newer by 75 months
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 VG-145 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VG-145

 E-M10 III VG-145 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III and the VG-145.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and VG-145 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and VG-145.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will give you greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography features
Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography features
73
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Olympus VG-145
77
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competitors in class (410 grams)
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography advice
Olympus VG-145 Sports photography advice
69
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
26
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (160 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography factors
Olympus VG-145 Travel photography factors
67
provides focus via touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
screen is not selfie friendly
62
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (160 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VG-145 Landscape photography highlights
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
36
relatively wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3")
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery pack (160 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Olympus VG-145
32
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (410g)
28
relatively wide (26mm)
supports face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VG-145
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus VG-145
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus VG-145
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2017-08-31 2011-07-27
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.40 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410g (0.90 lb) 120g (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 160 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $650 $0