Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was unveiled 6 years after the VG-145 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 III scores vs the VG-145 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus VG-145. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus VG-145
E-M10 III | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | July 2011 | Newer by 75 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-M10 III
VG-145 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus VG-145
E-M10 III | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 III and the VG-145.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and VG-145 is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and VG-145.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will give you greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus VG-145 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lb) | 120g (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 160 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $650 | $0 |