Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was unveiled 4 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 III XZ-2 iHS 
IntroducedAugust 2017December 2012More modern by 58 months
Screen resolution1040k920kCrisper screen (+120k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III

 XZ-2 iHS E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 III XZ-2 iHS 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and XZ-2 iHS is 80 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The picture here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and XZ-2 iHS.

All in all, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
73
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
46
has manual focus
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
supports touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition (410g)
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
lack of phase detect AF
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
good battery power (340 shots)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography advice
67
supports touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
more heavy than competition (410 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
61
good battery power (340 shots)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
80
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
55
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (340 CIPA)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
32
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competition (410g)
36
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes microphone port
display is not selfie friendly
more heavy than competition in class (346 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-08-31 2012-12-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 35
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410g (0.90 lb) 346g (0.76 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life 330 images 340 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail price $650 $450