Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was unveiled 4 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M10 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | December 2012 | More modern by 58 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III
XZ-2 iHS | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M10 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and XZ-2 iHS is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The picture here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 340 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $650 | $450 |