Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Succeeded the Sony A300
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and A330 (10MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and A330 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe 8010 was revealed 9 months later than the A330 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the 8010 scores versus the A330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sony A330
8010 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | May 2009 | Fresher by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus 8010
A330 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sony A330
8010 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display measurement | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 provides external measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony A330 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the 8010 vs the A330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and A330 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and A330.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 8010 using its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus 8010 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The newer 8010 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2009-05-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 529 grams (1.17 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $600 | $545 |