Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Panasonic FP5
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 141g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
  • Launched January 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP5, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the FP5 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FP5 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M10 III was unveiled 6 years after the FP5 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M10 III grades versus the FP5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FP5

 E-M10 III FP5 
LaunchedAugust 2017January 2011More modern by 81 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP5 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 FP5 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP5

 E-M10 III FP5 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic FP5 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III versus the FP5.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and FP5 is 80 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and FP5.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Panasonic FP5
73
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Panasonic FP5 Street photography details
77
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
has focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than others in class (410 grams)
63
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Panasonic FP5
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
has no phase detect AF
43
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery (260 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FP5 Travel photography highlights
67
has focus by touch
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
more heavy than others in class (410g)
display is not selfie friendly
65
better than average battery (260 CIPA)
boasts touch focus
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FP5 as a Landscape photography camera
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
40
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
better than average battery (260 shots)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging advice
Panasonic FP5 Vlogging advice
32
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (410g)
30
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP5
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FP5
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2017-08-31 2011-01-05
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Venus Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT Touch Screen LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.90 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410g (0.90 lbs) 141g (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 260 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $650 $199