Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX48, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 III was unveiled 8 years later than the FX48 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the FX48 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FX48
E-M10 III | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 105 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-M10 III
FX48 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX48
E-M10 III | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has specifications of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX48 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III and the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57805/57805faed7bd811ced8bd71d3a0fd6dc17f3b8b4" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and FX48 is 80 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da88/1da88fe6d3add05c053b512b88e0377bc43712d6" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and FX48.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64f9f/64f9fd8fc767149253b9d50ea7275d7ed2ae5ec9" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ae3/13ae391fd44e8f30ed1bc2ae4a0dec62a31a21e6" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $650 | $325 |