Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic LX5: A Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers

Choosing a camera that matches your photographic ambitions can be a daunting task, especially with options as diverse as the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5. Both are well-regarded, but cater to different types of photographers across varied budgets and shooting styles. Over my 15+ years testing cameras, I’ve learned that the best choice isn’t always the one with flashier specs, but the one matching your real-world workflow, genre preferences, and ergonomic comfort.

Having spent considerable time with both cameras - shooting everything from portraits in natural light to landscapes at dusk and street scenes in bustling cities - I’m here to give you an honest, detailed, and technical walkthrough of how these two stack up across key photographic disciplines, usability factors, and technological nuances. Let’s dive in.

Holding Camera in Hand: Size, Build, and Ergonomics Matter

First impressions stick. When I picked up the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic LX5 side by side, the physical and ergonomic differences were immediately apparent.

The E-M10 III sports a classic SLR-style mirrorless body - reasonably compact yet firm enough to fill the hand. Its 122 x 84 x 50 mm dimensions and 410 g weight impart confidence without tiring on longer shoots. The magnesium alloy chassis feels durable and well balanced. By contrast, the Panasonic LX5 is a true compact, measuring just 110 x 65 x 43 mm and weighing a featherlight 271 g. It fits snugly in any pocket or purse - perfect when ultimate portability is a must.

If you’re like me and prefer a tactile, comfortable grip that facilitates stability during extended handheld shooting, the Olympus wins. Its deeper handgrip and sturdier control dials allow faster, intuitive handling without looking away from the viewfinder. The Lumix LX5, with its minimalist buttons and smaller footprint, is best suited for photographers prioritizing travel light and stealthy street photography.

Controls and Interface: Speed and Precision at Your Fingertips

Top-of-camera controls and rear interface significantly influence shooting flow. Here’s a closer look.

Olympus’s E-M10 III employs a well thought-out control scheme: dual function dials allow quick changes to shutter speed and aperture in manual modes, a dedicated mode dial, and a surrounded four-way pad for custom function shortcuts. The physical feedback is crisp, with buttons spaced just right - no fumbling when the moment is fleeting.

Panasonic’s LX5 uses a more compact design with fewer dedicated buttons. While it supports manual exposure modes, dial control is less versatile. Buttons are smaller, with tighter spacing on the rear panel, which can slow down operation during fast-paced shoots.

The E-M10 III’s interface is topped off with a tilting touchscreen LCD, enhancing creative angle shots and menu navigation - a feature missing on the LX5’s fixed, lower-resolution display. This difference becomes even clearer when focusing on live view and focus point selection.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Fundamentals

At the heart of any camera lies its sensor - the gatekeeper of image quality. Understanding the sensor differences requires technical depth.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III features a 16MP Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.4 x 13 mm with a total sensor area of 226.2 mm². While modest by today’s full-frame standards, the Four Thirds format strikes a balance between sensor size and lens compactness. The E-M10 III uses a CMOS sensor with a conventional anti-aliasing filter, supporting native ISO settings from 200 to 25600, enabling better noise control. Its 121-point contrast-detection autofocus system - although without phase detection - performs admirably in various lighting conditions.

Conversely, the Panasonic LX5 houses a much smaller 1/1.63” (8.07 x 5.56 mm) CCD sensor with around 10MP resolution. This sensor area (44.87 mm²) equates to roughly a quarter the size of Olympus’s sensor. While CCD sensors can produce excellent colors and sharp images at base ISO, the LX5’s max ISO setting of 12800 is more theoretical than practical for low-light use, suffering from higher noise at elevated sensitivities. The LX5 also uses contrast-detection autofocus over a 23-point array without face detection or tracking.

Put simply: the Olympus delivers superior dynamic range, better high-ISO performance, and more detailed images, critical whether you’re capturing landscapes with intricate tonal gradations or portraiture requiring faithful skin tones.

Viewing and Composing Your Shot: Viewfinders and Screens

Knowing exactly what you’re shooting is pivotal to great images. Here the cameras diverge strongly.

The Olympus E-M10 III integrates a high-resolution 2,360k-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) offering 100% coverage with 0.62x magnification. This EVF provides a near-optical clarity experience with accurate exposure previews, helpful for manual focusing, and image composition in bright sunlight where LCDs falter.

By contrast, the LX5 lacks a built-in EVF. While an external electronic viewfinder is available as an optional accessory, most users rely on its 3-inch fixed LCD with 460k dots - less bright and lower resolution than Olympus’s 1040k-dot tilting touchscreen. The absence of touchscreen on the LX5 also limits focusing precision and menu navigation speed.

In busy or bright environments, relying on an EVF is a significant advantage for photographers wanting complete control without strain, meaning I naturally favored the Olympus in varied light situations.

Autofocus System: Tracking, Accuracy, and Speed

Autofocus (AF) performance is a core determinant, especially for moving subjects or when working quickly.

The Olympus’s 121-point contrast-detection AF - while lacking dedicated phase-detection pixels - compensates with a sophisticated algorithm and face detection that works reliably in both single and continuous AF modes (up to 8.6 fps burst). Eye autofocus is absent, but face tracking is precise, crucial for portrait and event photography. The in-body 5-axis image stabilization further enhances autofocus success rates by reducing camera shake during telephoto or macro focusing.

The Panasonic LX5’s AF system is more limited, with a 23-point contrast-detection system. It lacks continuous AF tracking or face detection, restricting usability for sports or wildlife where speed and subject tracking are paramount. Its burst shooting is capped around 3 fps, comparatively slow for action capture.

In real-world shooting, Olympus’s AF felt nimble and confident, while the LX5 was better suited for still subjects or slow compositions.

Lens Ecosystem and Focal Versatility

Lens compatibility often dictates long-term creative possibilities.

The Olympus E-M10 III’s Micro Four Thirds mount unlocks access to an extensive range of 107 native lenses from Olympus and Panasonic, plus third-party options. With focal lengths ranging from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, and specialized primes for portrait, macro, and astrophotography, enthusiasts gain unmatched versatility. The 2.1x crop factor can be advantageous for telephoto reach, while wide-angle shooting remains practical with dedicated lenses.

The LX5 comes with a fixed 24-90 mm equivalent zoom lens (F2.0–3.3). It’s a strong performer for an all-in-one compact, with bright aperture on the wide end and macro to 1 cm. But you’re locked into this range. While this lens covers many casual subjects from street portraits to landscapes, there’s no scope for interchangeable optical creativity or upgrades - a trade-off you consider if portability is paramount.

Handling Different Photography Genres

Let me share how each camera performs across common photographic disciplines to help you envision your shooting fit.

Portrait Photography

Portraits demand accurate skin tones, pleasing bokeh, and dependable eye/face detection.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Panasonic’s color science is pleasant, but I find Olympus natively renders more neutral and realistic skin tones - a boon when client satisfaction matters. The Micro Four Thirds lens options include many fast primes that deliver creamy background blur. Face detection is reliable in all modes, aiding precise focus on expressive eyes.

• Panasonic LX5: Its f/2.0 aperture at 24mm is versatile but less capable for shallow depth of field portraits. Absence of face or eye AF complicates quick focusing on people, requiring manual precision.

Landscape Photography

Here, resolution, dynamic range, and weather resistance are crucial.

• Olympus E-M10 III: With 16MP resolution and commendable dynamic range for its sensor size, the camera captures detail well in shadows and highlights. Although not weather-sealed, its comparatively rugged build and wide lens availability make it my pick for landscape enthusiasts on a budget.

• Panasonic LX5: Lower resolution and smaller sensor limit the scope for large prints or heavy cropping. Dynamic range is constrained by the older CCD sensor. Its compact size is favorable for casual landscapes during travel but lacks professional robustness.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Speed, autofocus reliability, and burst rate matter most.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Eight point six fps continuous shooting coupled with accurate AF tracking makes it surprisingly competent for wildlife photography if paired with telephoto lenses. The in-body stabilization helps with sharp images despite hand tremors.

• Panasonic LX5: Burst mode tops out at 3 fps with no AF tracking - a bottleneck for action photography. The modest zoom limits reach on distant subjects. I wouldn’t recommend the LX5 for serious wildlife or sports.

Street Photography

Discreetness, portability, and low-light flexibility come to the fore.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Though compact for an interchangeable-lens model, the body is bulkier than the LX5 and noisier at shutter release. Still, the silent electronic shutter mode is handy in quiet, candid situations. Its superior high ISO helps under dim street lighting.

• Panasonic LX5: Exemplary compactness, quiet operation, and lens reach fit street photographers who prize blending in. Although limited in AF sophistication, it remains an excellent grab-and-go camera for urban exploration.

Macro Photography

Close focusing and stabilization are key.

• Olympus E-M10 III: The camera supports focus bracketing and boasts five-axis stabilization, enabling sharp close-up shots without tripod reliance. Coupled with dedicated macro lenses, it excels in fine details.

• Panasonic LX5: The 1 cm macro capability from the fixed lens is very useful for casual macro work, though lack of stabilization and manual focus aids limit ultimate precision.

Night and Astrophotography

High ISO performance and long exposure support decide results.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Native ISO ceiling of 25600 and long exposure capabilities allow creative night shots with manageable noise. The articulated screen aids composing tricky angles under starry skies.

• Panasonic LX5: Its smaller sensor struggles in darkness, and limited exposure options constrain astrophotography potential.

Video Capabilities

If you shoot video, specs and ergonomics tip the scale.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Shoots clean 4K UHD video at 30 fps with a respectable 102 Mbps bitrate. Although lacking dedicated mic input, in-body stabilization helps handheld footage. The touchscreen assists focus pulling.

• Panasonic LX5: Limited to 720p HD video at 60 fps. Video quality is acceptable for casual use but not for serious videography.

Travel Photography

Portability, battery life, and versatility matter.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Solid battery life rated at approximately 330 shots per charge and Micro Four Thirds lens system offer adaptability on the road, albeit with the added bulk.

• Panasonic LX5: Smaller and lighter with lower battery endurance (though specific rating unavailable). Ideal for minimalist travelers or secondary “pocket” camera alongside a dedicated system.

Professional Use and Workflow

Professional reliability, file formats, and integration efficiency are essentials.

• Olympus E-M10 III: Supports raw format, robust build, and integrates well with industry-standard post-processing software. While entry-level, it still serves as a capable backup or second body for pros.

• Panasonic LX5: Also raw capable, but limited file resolution and manual controls restrict professional adoption. Better suited for casual or enthusiast photography.

Stabilization and Flash

Image stabilization technology enhances handheld shooting freedom.

• Olympus E-M10 III employs sensor-based 5-axis stabilization, effective across focal lengths and orientations, minimizing blur without crutches.

• Panasonic LX5 features optical stabilization in its lens, which helps at moderate zoom ranges but is less versatile.

Both have built-in flashes; Olympus’s flash range of 5.8 meters is decent, while Panasonic excels slightly with 7.2 meters but with simpler flash mode options.

Connectivity and Storage

Modern connectivity options affect workflow smoothness.

• Olympus E-M10 III includes built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps, but no Bluetooth or NFC.

• Panasonic LX5 lacks wireless features entirely but has HDMI and USB 2.0 ports for tethered transfer.

Storage-wise, both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Panasonic LX5 also offers limited internal storage for emergency shots.

Battery Life and Usability Endurance

Real shooting depends on power, of course.

The Olympus’s BLS-50 battery guarantees about 330 shots per charge, reliable enough for a day’s shooting with intermittent reviewing and flash use.

The Panasonic LX5’s actual battery life figures are scarce, but user experience hints at shorter endurance given its compact build and less efficient power management.

Price and Value: What Do You Get for Your Money?

At launch prices, Olympus E-M10 III typically runs around $650, positioned as an entry-level interchangeable lens mirrorless aimed at enthusiasts.

The Panasonic LX5, at approximately $294 (historically), catered to enthusiasts seeking a high-quality compact camera around a mid-range budget.

Considering today’s market, the E-M10 III offers more future-proof performance and versatility albeit with a heftier price tag. The LX5’s appeal lies in its pocketable form and simplicity.

Image Quality Samples: What the Cameras Really Deliver

I captured comparable test shots under varied conditions to demonstrate real-world capabilities.

Olympus E M10 MIII front Olympus E M10 MIII screen back Panasonic LX5 front Panasonic LX5 screen back

The Olympus shows greater dynamic range and cleaner high-ISO files. The Panasonic’s images are softer, with less sharpness and more noise beyond ISO 400.

Overall Scores and Ratings Based on Personalized Testing

My rigorous testing rates the Olympus E-M10 III higher for versatility, image quality, and autofocus, while the LX5 scores respectably for portability and simplicity.

Specialty Performance: Which Camera Excels in Each Photography Genre?

• Portrait: Olympus leads with AF and bokeh capabilities
• Landscape: Olympus wins for resolution and dynamic range
• Wildlife/Sports: Olympus surpasses on AF and burst speed
• Street: LX5 shines in portability but Olympus offers better low light
• Macro: Olympus more advanced for dedicated close-ups
• Night/Astro: Olympus superior sensitivity and settings
• Video: Olympus 4K vs Panasonic HD
• Travel: Panasonic for weight, Olympus for flexibility
• Professional: Olympus supports full workflows and formats

Final Thoughts: Matching Your Photography Style With the Right Tool

Having laid out the technical, practical, and creative considerations, here’s what I conclude:

Choose the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III if:

• You want an affordable entry into interchangeable lens mirrorless systems with serious image quality
• You’re invested in multiple photography genres, needing flexibility, fast AF, and strong low-light capability
• You don’t mind carrying a slightly larger body for enhanced control and robustness
• 4K video and in-body stabilization are important to your workflow

Opt for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 if:

• Portability and stealthiness are paramount for your shooting style, particularly street and travel photography
• You need a simple, all-in-one camera with manual control but don’t require professional-level image quality
• You prefer minimal gear and intuitive compact functionality without the complexity of lenses
• Budget constraints favor a used or affordable compact with respectable image quality

Final Personal Reflection

After numerous real-world shoots, combining technical testing and creative exploration, I find the E-M10 III more suited for photographers who want to grow and experiment across styles - offering tools that reward learning and pushing boundaries. The LX5, meanwhile, is a confident companion when a lightweight, straightforward device is the priority rather than system expansion.

Whichever camera you lean towards, I encourage grounding your choice in where your photography passion truly lies. Your best camera is the one that inspires you to capture your most memorable shots, day after day.

Safe shooting!