Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Announced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX3000
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung NX2000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NX2000 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was announced 5 years before the NX2000 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the NX2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung NX2000. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung NX2000
GR Digital III | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NX2000 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 920k | Clearer screen (+232k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung NX2000
GR Digital III | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has sizing of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III and the NX2000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and NX2000 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and NX2000.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will provide you with more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 228 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $399 | $599 |