Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony HX200V
  • New Model is Sony HX400V
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was announced 4 years after the HX300 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the HX300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony HX300

 E-M10 III HX300 
IntroducedAugust 2017February 2013Newer by 56 months
Display resolution1040k921kSharper display (+119k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 HX300 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX300

 E-M10 III HX300 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III and the HX300.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and HX300 is 80 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and HX300.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony HX300 will offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Sony HX300
73
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
exports RAW formats
43
manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography factors
Sony HX300 Street photography factors
77
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
includes focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
50
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (623 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Sony HX300
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect auto focus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
has tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography highlights
Sony HX300 Travel photography highlights
67
includes focus by touch
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
54
decent MP (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (623g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Sony HX300 Landscape photography details
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
49
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging factors
Sony HX300 Vlogging factors
32
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
heavier than competitors (410g)
25
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing external mic support
heavier than competitors in class (623g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony HX300
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2017-08-31 2013-02-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410g (0.90 lbs) 623g (1.37 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) -
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $650 $339