Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
91 Imaging
50 Features
68 Overall
57
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 240g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Later Model is Sony RX100 II
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the RX100 (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX100 (1") come with different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was manufactured 5 years after the RX100 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M10 III grades vs the RX100 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Sony RX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX100
E-M10 III | RX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | August 2012 | Newer by 61 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 over the Olympus E-M10 III
RX100 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX100
E-M10 III | RX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III provides physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III and the RX100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and RX100 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The image below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and RX100.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony RX100 will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2012-08-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 240g (0.53 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 390 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $650 | $448 |