Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus VG-120, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the VG-120 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 was revealed 3 years after the VG-120 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M10 scores vs the VG-120 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Olympus VG-120. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus VG-120
E-M10 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 39 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-M10
VG-120 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus VG-120
E-M10 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 enjoys exterior measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-120 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus VG-120 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 vs the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8257a/8257af4db767abe97628c7fb8d50a80e46053803" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 and VG-120 is 82 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29311/29311fb45e82a100a76e373f6cc2007fda20188f" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and VG-120.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 will offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M10 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a63b4/a63b459f7ca61b9e22158abd8b5343d6b8595647" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e78/01e7868c5b08996cdd209c03426328af0368b631" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus VG-120 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 pounds) | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 160 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $600 | $190 |