Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3489a/3489af051e3f1e96e94ebc3ad8548328466cc9bf" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 210g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ18
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M10 versus Panasonic ZS8, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the ZS8 (14MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and ZS8 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 was announced 2 years after the ZS8 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS8 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-M10 grades vs the ZS8 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Panasonic ZS8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Panasonic ZS8
E-M10 | ZS8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 33 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS8 over the Olympus E-M10
ZS8 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic ZS8
E-M10 | ZS8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 has got outside dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS8 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 versus Panasonic ZS8 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 versus the ZS8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce27/7ce274c88785109be52dcd8d32377b3d8d1d0170" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and ZS8 is 82 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d24/00d24edf5ed9b82942fbf6c7e02b78ca73309d50" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and ZS8.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52593/5259376baf14a244000f3deb77a39b8f950bc881" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17564/175642861debd36f59831159a5e5ca9f55d541ca" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic ZS8 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ18 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-03-18 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 lbs) | 210g (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 340 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $600 | $275 |