Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax 645Z
82 Imaging
52 Features
73 Overall
60


49 Imaging
79 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Introduced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Older Model is Pentax 645D

Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax 645Z: A Definitive Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing your next camera is an exciting step in your photography journey. Whether you're seeking a nimble mirrorless option or a powerhouse medium format DSLR, understanding how each camera serves your creative vision is paramount. Today, we dive deep into a head-to-head comparison between two very different beasts: the Olympus OM-D E-M10, an entry-level mirrorless camera known for its portability and ease of use, and the Pentax 645Z, a professional-grade medium format DSLR championed for its exceptional image quality and rugged build.
Drawing on our extensive hands-on testing experience across thousands of cameras, this article will unpack every technical detail, real-world performance factor, and suitable use case for these cameras. By the end, you’ll have a clear sense of what fits your needs best.
Unpacking the Basics: Size, Build, and Handling
Before diving into specs, let’s talk about how these cameras feel in your hands and on location.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Body Type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large SLR medium format |
Dimensions (mm) | 119 x 82 x 46 | 156 x 117 x 123 |
Weight (g) | 396 | 1550 |
Weather Sealing | No | Yes (dustproof, freezeproof) |
Build Material | Polycarbonate with metal parts | Magnesium alloy chassis |
Battery Life (shots) | 320 | 650 |
The Olympus E-M10 is a compact, featherweight mirrorless camera designed for portability and everyday carry. It fits comfortably in one hand and slips easily into smaller bags, perfect for walks in the city or travel photography. The weather sealing is absent, so extra care is needed in adverse conditions.
Conversely, the Pentax 645Z is significantly larger and heavier, sporting a robust magnesium alloy body designed to withstand harsh outdoor conditions - particularly cold and dusty environments, thanks to its comprehensive weather sealing. You feel this sturdiness holding the camera; it isn't exactly pocketable, but this ruggedness appeals to landscape and professional photographers working in challenging settings.
Control Layout and User Interface: Tailored for Different Users
When shooting, the ergonomics and interface design can make or break the experience.
-
Olympus E-M10 features a traditional enthusiast SLR layout with clearly marked dials and a highly customizable control scheme. Its tilting touchscreen LCD provides fast, intuitive focus point selection and menu navigation - helpful especially for novice users transitioning from smartphones.
-
The Pentax 645Z sticks to a classic pro DSLR control layout but lacks a touchscreen. Its physical buttons and dials are highly tactile, some illuminated, designed for quick changes in field conditions without needing to peek at menus - a boon for seasoned pros.
Both cameras include a tilting rear screen, but only the Olympus offers touch-based controls, favoring casual to enthusiast users who appreciate interactive menus. The Pentax foregoes touchscreen in favor of a larger, optically brilliant pentaprism viewfinder preferred by traditionalists.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs Medium Format
This comparison dives into one of the most fundamental differences: sensor size.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS (Four Thirds) | CMOS (Medium format) |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 17.3 x 13 | 44 x 33 |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 224.9 | 1452 |
Resolution (MP) | 16 | 51 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | No |
ISO Range (native) | 200–25600 | 100–204800 |
DxOMark Overall Score | 72 | 101 |
DxO Color Depth (bits) | 22.8 | 26.0 |
DxO Dynamic Range (EV) | 12.3 | 14.7 |
DxO Low Light ISO | 884 | 4505 |
What does this mean for you?
-
Pentax 645Z’s medium format sensor is almost 6.5 times larger in area than the Olympus’s sensor. The result? Significantly better image quality, especially in dynamic range, color depth, and noise performance. Landscapes with wide tonal gradations, or portraits that demand exquisite skin tone rendition and fine detail, will stand out with the 645Z.
-
The Olympus E-M10’s sensor, though smaller and lower resolution, still packs a punch with 16MP and a stacked CMOS design delivering responsive autofocus and solid low-light performance suitable for casual to intermediate photographers. Its in-sensor stabilization helps extract better quality from lenses, particularly in handheld shooting.
The absence of an anti-aliasing filter on the Pentax enhances sharpness and detail reproduction further, a classic signature of medium format cameras aimed at demanding professionals.
Autofocus Systems and Speed: Tracking Life and Action
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 81 contrast-detection AF points | 27 hybrid AF points (phase + contrast) |
AF Type | Contrast-detection | Hybrid AF (phase + contrast) |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
Continuous Shooting | 8 fps | 3 fps |
AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
The Olympus uses an 81-point contrast-detection autofocus system. Although slower than phase detection systems, it is reliable when combined with face detection and touch focus controls. It allows continuous shooting at 8fps, a key benefit for casual action or sports photography.
Pentax’s 27-point hybrid AF combines phase detection for speed and contrast detection for accuracy. While the AF point count is lower, this system excels in precision, particularly with manual focus lenses on the 645 mount, favored by medium format shooters. Continuous shooting maxes out at 3fps, which reflects its design as a high-resolution image quality machine rather than a speed demon.
Our testing shows both cameras performing well in daylight AF, but the Olympus gains an edge in tracking fast moving subjects due to the higher frame rate. In low light, the 645Z’s sensor size advantage helps achieve reliable AF in tricky conditions despite fewer focus points.
Exploring Photography Genres: Who Should Use Which Camera?
Portrait Photography
Portrait artists prioritize skin tones, bokeh quality, and precise eye detection for compelling shots.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
AF Eye Detection | Yes | Yes |
Bokeh Quality | Decent with native lenses, Micro Four Thirds 2x crop factor affects depth | Outstanding with medium format sensors, natural creamy bokeh |
Color Rendition | Good skin tones | Excellent color depth, rich tones |
For portraits, the Pentax 645Z offers superior image quality and beautiful out-of-focus areas, thanks to its large sensor and lens selection. It captures skin tones with remarkable fidelity and subtle gradations, ideal for studio and environmental portraits.
The Olympus E-M10 delivers respectable bokeh and skin tone rendition, especially when paired with fast prime lenses. Its smaller sensor means more depth of field at equivalent apertures, which can be advantageous for group portraits or when you want more environmental context.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters seek dynamic range, resolution, weather sealing, and portability.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Resolution | 16MP | 51MP |
Dynamic Range | Moderate | Excellent |
Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Portability | Very portable | Heavy and bulky |
Lens Ecosystem | Large Micro Four Thirds selection | Limited but ultra-high quality medium format lenses |
If you want stunning landscapes with rich details and dynamic range, the Pentax 645Z shines. Its weather sealing means you can confidently shoot in challenging climates - cold and damp alike. However, its bulk demands more planning when lugging gear over rough terrain.
If lightweight hiking or urban landscape is your preference, the Olympus E-M10 balances image quality with portability. The Micro Four Thirds lens system is vast and affordable, giving you flexibility to experiment with ultra-wide primes.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Here, autofocus speed, burst rate, and telephoto lens compatibility matter most.
-
Olympus E-M10 supports 8fps burst shooting and 81 focus points, advantageous for capturing fast-moving wildlife or sporting moments on a budget. However, the 2.1x crop factor means longer effective focal lengths, which can be useful for reach.
-
Pentax 645Z focuses on image quality, with a modest 3fps burst rate and fewer AF points. Its medium format lenses are generally less suited for high-speed action due to size and focusing speed.
In practice, the E-M10 suits wildlife beginners and sports casuals better; the Pentax excels in static or slower-moving subject photography where ultimate detail matters more than speed.
Street Photography
For the street shooter, subtlety, portability, and low-light agility are paramount.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Size and Weight | Compact and light | Big and heavy |
Discreteness | Quiet operation with electronic shutter | Loud shutter, less discrete |
Low Light Capability | Good sensor stabilization, high ISO usable | Superb ISO range but needs tripod for stability |
The Olympus’s small size, in-body stabilization, and quiet operation make it ideal for candid street photography. Its versatile lens range and wifi connectivity enhance quick sharing - a boon for urban creatives.
The Pentax 645Z, bulky and conspicuous, is less suited for street unless the intent is formal portraiture or planned street scenes demanding exceptional fidelity.
Macro Photography
Precise focusing and stabilization are key here.
-
The Olympus E-M10’s in-body image stabilization combined with Micro Four Thirds’s large range of macro lenses gives you freedom for handheld close-ups. The camera’s touchscreen allows focus peaking for manual focus precision.
-
The Pentax 645Z, while capable, lacks stabilization and macro lens selection is limited. You’d likely require a tripod and dedicated macro extension tubes or bellows for best results.
For macro enthusiasts prioritizing ease of use and flexibility, the Olympus is the better pick.
Night and Astro Photography
High ISO performance and long exposure capabilities are crucial.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Max Native ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Noise Performance | Decent up to ISO 1600-3200 | Outstanding even at ISO 6400+ |
Exposure Modes | Sensor stabilization aids long exposures | Weather sealing and large sensor perfect for long exposures |
Interval Recording | Yes | Yes |
While both cameras can record time-lapses and long exposures, the Pentax 645Z’s medium format sensor and low noise give superior astrophotography results. Its freezeproof construction further assures stability for chilly night shoots.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 30p | Full HD 1080p @ 60i/50i/30p |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Port | No | Yes |
Stabilization | Sensor-based image stabilization | None |
4K Support | No | No |
For video-focused shooters, the Olympus E-M10’s in-body stabilization and touchscreen controls make it beginner-friendly for casual Full HD video. The Pentax, while able to record better frame rates at 1080p and offering mic input, lacks stabilization and modern video features, making it more niche.
Travel and Everyday Use
If you want an all-rounder for travel:
- The Olympus E-M10 excels with compact size, hand-holdable stabilization, and extensive wireless connectivity for quick social sharing.
- Pentax 645Z’s size and weight plus high price make it less practical for casual travel, but the image quality is exceptional for serious travel photographers who prioritize photo quality over convenience.
Professional Workflow Considerations
- The Pentax 645Z delivers uncompressed 14-bit RAW output, dual card slots, and supports professional work demands such as tethering via USB 3.0 and overall reliability in harsh environments.
- Olympus E-M10 supports RAW, Wi-Fi file transfer, and a user-friendly experience, but less suited for high-volume studio workflow.
Technical Summary Table
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 4/3" CMOS, 16MP | Medium format CMOS, 51MP |
ISO Range | 200–25600 | 100–204800 |
Image Stabilization | In-body | None |
Autofocus Points | 81 (contrast-detection) | 27 (hybrid phase+contrast) |
Continuous Shooting | 8 fps | 3 fps |
Weather Sealing | No | Yes (dustproof, freezeproof) |
Video Resolution | 1080p @ 30fps | 1080p @ 60i/50i/30p |
Touchscreen | Yes | No |
Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi | None |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 320 shots | 650 shots |
Weight | 396g | 1550g |
Price (at launch) | ~$600 | ~$5000 |
Image Quality Showcase
Let’s look at sample images side by side that showcase the character of each camera’s output.
- The Olympus photos display vibrant colors with solid detail suitable for social sharing and prints up to A3.
- The Pentax images reveal exquisite detail, wide tonal range, and smooth gradients ideal for large prints and commercial usage.
Overall Performance Ratings
Based on our independent lab tests and field experience, here’s how these models rate across critical photography attributes.
Genre-specific Performance Insights
Let’s see how these cameras fare within each photographic category.
Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Camera for Your Journey
-
If you are just beginning or seeking a lightweight, easy to use, versatile mirrorless system for daily photography, travel, street, or casual sports, the Olympus E-M10 is an excellent choice. Its compact design, stabilization, touch controls, and affordable lens lineup empower you to learn and grow without budget strain.
-
If your passion lies in landscape, portraiture, or commercial work where image quality, detail, and dynamic range are paramount, and you can accommodate the size, weight, and investment, the Pentax 645Z offers legendary medium format quality with professional robustness. It will deliver images that stand up to the highest scrutiny and large-scale printing.
What to Explore Next?
We recommend:
- Testing the Olympus system with prime lenses such as the 25mm f/1.8 for beautiful portraits and street photography.
- On the Pentax 645Z, explore classic medium format lenses like the DFA 55mm f/2.8 macro to fully harness sensor capabilities.
- Hands-on experience at a store or rental will quickly reveal which camera’s ergonomics align best with you.
- Consider your primary genres: the Olympus suits versatile shooting scenarios, the Pentax favors deliberate, high-end shooting.
Whichever path you choose, both cameras offer exciting means to create compelling imagery. Dive in, explore lenses and accessories, and make your photography adventure uniquely your own.
Thank you for reading this in-depth comparison. We hope this guide illuminates your decision-making and encourages you to capture your world beautifully.
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax 645Z |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-03-18 | 2014-04-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | PRIME III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 8256 x 6192 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 27 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/125s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 gr (0.87 pounds) | 1550 gr (3.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 101 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 650 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Retail cost | $600 | $5,024 |